PROSELYTING DISCIPLES AWAY

"For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock.Also of your own selves shall men arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away disciples after them" (Acts20:29, 30). The inspired apostle addressed the elders ofthe church in Ephesus whom he had called to Miletus(vs. 17). The warning involved the attempt of a falseteacher who would come among them to deceive andmislead disciples, and even one or more of the elderswould lure the disciples away after them.

There is a principle in this statement that has anapplication to some situations in the church today. Thatsituation concerns the growing efforts to move Christians from one congregation to another in the pretenseof building up the church. Some want to build a reputation as a great and powerful preacher who can commandhis place and financial reward. But this is a dishonorable and offensive way to try to build the membership ofa congregation. Others have labored to increase themembership in the kingdom and the local church, and someone else persuades these disciples to leave thatwork and join another for no reason but to increase thatmembership at the expense of others. This process converts no one to Christ.

Several years ago James P. Miller wrote an article on"Sheep Stealing," in which he took to task those who were seducing members from the congregation where hewas then preaching. That problem is still around and it is not localized either in time or place.

The practice has a sinister motive: to reduce the membership of other congregations and pocket theproceeds for self-praise and glory. It has the same motiveas one who lies and gossips about another; he hopes toreduce as much as possible the name and reputation ofthe other, and at the same time gain favor and positionwith his hearers. In my judgment, one who steals members from other congregations in the general areawhere he preaches, is an insensitive, self centered promoter who does not scruple to boast at the expense ofothers. One who secretly calls, writes and visits members of other congregations, with the express purpose ofsoliciting members for the congregation where he labors, is not building up the kingdom of Christ.

Of course, if a congregation supports and endorsesfalse doctrine and practice, those members ought to betaught the truth, and they will leave when they areconvinced that they cannot continue to serve God wherethey are. But efforts should be made to teach ALL members of congregations promoting false doctrines.Are not their souls as important as any other?

The work of an evangelist does not include interference in the affairs and work of congregations all over agiven area. An evangelist is to edify the church, not movearound members from one congregation to another. The work of an evangelist is to: "Preach the word; be instantin season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with alllongsuffering and doctrine. ... but watch thou in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist,make full proof of thy ministry" (2 Tim. 4:2-5).

We have come to expect the business corporations ofthe world to use disreputable tactics to destroy one another and gain by base methods, but who would havethought that preachers of the gospel could conscientiously use such tactics to entice members of one congregation to the one where they labor and claim that theyare causing the church to grow?

On the other hand, any Christian has the scripturalright to move from one place to another, and he may move his congregational membership from one place toanother, if he thinks he is increasing his opportunitiesto learn and contribute to the work of the body of Christ.

But that is a far cry from a preacher or some zealousmember seducing one away from the congregationwhere he is serving the Lord scripturally.

Some of the highly motivated "personal work" enthusiasts have a reputation for their ability to teach anddirect their disciples to use any method to increase the membership of the congregation where they are. Someof it is high pressure sales, and some of it involves anunscriptural organization. "Personal work" that stresses converting sinners to Christ by the gospel ofChrist, and only that, in leading them out of darknessinto the light of truth, is important and essential and should be a part of every Christian's life. This is sound Bible study in homes and wherever people will listen.But transferring members from one congregation toanother is not converting anyone to Christ, and is notincreasing the church of Christ. Jesus said to teach,baptize, and teach (Matt. 28:18-20).

If it is a righteous thing to lure members from onecongregation to another, by all means let all of us do it.Let us open the door for teaching and exhorting allevangelists to use all their efforts to persuade membersof other congregations to leave and become a part of thecongregation where they work. I will assure you of onething: the material and social side of life will be emphasized far above all other interests. The large, beautifulchurch buildings will be promoted because they are anenticement to members of other congregations. Socials,food and frolic will be held forth as an encouragement formembers to move from one place to another. Youngpeople with the dating format and possible mate matching will be advertised as a means of encouraging theyouth and parents of young people to leave one congregation to go to another.

One of the sad consequences of this operation is thatthe old, weak, poor, uncommitted, small talented andlazy members are not wanted. These are encouraged togo to other congregations. The only disciples they proselyte are those they believe will enhance their group,their reputation and glory. What a shame! Think onthese things!

WHO ARE THE SOUND?

To be sound is to be healthy. In the New Testamentthere are two Greek words (an adjective and a verb)translated "sound" and both have to do with bodilyhealth. W.E. Vine renders the term HUGIAINO as — "to be healthy, sound in health." It is used in its literal sense in several passages including Luke 5:31 — "Theythat are in health have no need of a physician ..." But itis also used metaphorically to represent the condition of a man's character and teaching.

It is not difficult to know when the body is sound.Soundness occurs when every part is working according to it's purpose and in harmony with every other part.Soundness is the absence of abnormalities; the absenceof disease. However, it is entirely possible for one tothink he is sound (in good health) when, in actuality, heis suffering from a hidden disease. To boast of soundnessdoesn't necessarily make it so. There's more to it than mere verbalization.

If I seek to be sound spiritually then my whole beingmust be brought into harmony with God's will and purpose. There must be a certain symmetry and balance to my spiritual development. At the same time, there must be an absence of any abnormal growths which threaten my spiritual health. For example, if I were tostrengthen my right arm through years of weight-liftingand muscular conditioning to the point that I couldcrush the skull of a man with one glancing blow, whileat the same time allowing my left arm to grow weakthrough non-use, it would not be soundness that I haveexperienced but abnormal growth.

It is easy to fall into the trap of abnormal growth. Itis easy to develop strength in one area and neglectanother. It is easy to gain the name of being very soundbecause of toughness along certain lines while allowingsuch things as character and personal integrity toremain undeveloped. Such is not soundness but abnormal growth.

There are some who excel in the arena of courage,boldness and the ability to defend the truth. Thank God for very one! We would all do well to keep our swordssharpened. And, yet, is it possible that some excel inboldness but are deficient in kindness and brotherly consideration? Can it be that some seek earnestly tocontend for the faith but often fail to forbear?

The person in good spiritual-health knows the need for balanced development in every area. The "sound" man is brave and firm but also meek and merciful. He never compromises God's truth, but seeks to yield in the arena of opinions and preferences for the sake of peace.If he fails in any of these areas he fails to be sound.

One of my favorite writers is R.L. Whiteside. About

this subject, he said:"More than fifty years ago persistent effort was begunto lead churches away from the New Testament wayof work and worship, and much harm was done.Those who fell in love with the move — instrumental music in the worship, the various societies, etc., —called themselves Progressives. Many brethren opposed them on the ground that they had departed from sound doctrine; and so we began to hear suchexpressions as 'sound brethren,' "sound preachers,' 'sound churches.' Too many took it for granted thatopposition to innovations constituted soundness. To be sound you must oppose many things, but youmay oppose all innovations and still be unsound." "... I would like to impress upon all that the requirement to be sound in the faith and doctrine is not fulfilled by simply opposing. A man may oppose every departure from the truth and still be unsound, simply because he fails to come up to the standard of his duty.The requirement covers the whole of life." (Doctrinal Discourses, pg. 273-274)Good point! How often are we guilty of limiting

"soundness" to selected points of doctrine? A church isviewed as "sound" if they oppose institutionalism andthe social gospel, all the while making no effort towardscorrective discipline (1 Cor. 5), loving one another (1Thess. 4:9-10), and reaching the lost in the local area(Acts 11:19-26). A preacher is seen as "sound" because ofhis courage to defend against outside error while, at the same time, he fails in his duties at home or in his ability to mirror the attitudes and attributes of Jesus in his personal character. Could it be that we often (collectively and individually) boast of our "soundness" whenin fact we show signs of ill-health and sickness?

"The time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine ..." (2 Tim. 4:3). Such is a potent warning thatneeds to remain fresh upon our minds. That's why Paulsaid to "retain the standard of sound words which you have heard from me, in the faith and love which are in Christ Jesus" (2 Tim. 1:13).

In his letter to Titus, Paul declared, "But as for you,speak the things which are fitting for sound doctrine"(Titus 2:1). Read on. Under the above heading are thenlisted several personal duties and responsibilities which cover the whole spectrum of Christian conduct andbehavior. If one is given to gossip, he is not sound butunsound. A woman who is not in subjection to herhusband is not sound but is unsound. A man who fails to be temperate fails to be sound.

"... realizing the fact that law is not made for arighteous man, but for those who are lawless and rebellious, for the ungoldy and sinners, for the unholy andprofane, for those who kill their fathers and mothers, for murderers and immoral men and homosexuals and kidnappers and liars and perjurers, and whatever else

is contrary to sound teaching" (1 Tim. 1:9-10 — emphasis mine).

It should be our aim to be "sound." Let us seek to be sound congregationally as we pattern ourselves afterthe New Testament order. To fail to do so renders us unsound. But let us also pursue soundness in our personal lives and character. Am I really walking close tothe example of Jesus? Do I know how to forbear, love andexclude bitterness from my life? Am I unusually suspicious and cynical of others and prone to blow things out of proportion? Do I render to another the benefit of the doubt or am I prone to harsh and unfair judgmental-ism? Do I traffic in gossip and half-truths in order to prove a point or do I always seek to be fair and ethical? Strong questions. But the man in pursuit of soundnessis not bothered by such confrontations.

It's so easy to label someone "sound" or "unsound"(and I'm not opposed at all to that designation!). Let's just realize that soundness involves spiritual growthand maturity in all areas of a Christian's responsibilitybefore God. To fail in understanding this point willresult in abnormal growths leading to an unhealthyspiritual condition. Strive to be sound!

AN OPEN LETTER TO OUR READERS

Dear Readers:

The time has come to place some facts before you andappeal for your understanding and help. It is becomingincreasingly difficult to operate this paper financially.Increased postal charges within recent months haveadded greatly to the problem. Printing cost have alsoincreased since the last rate increase and we are expecting another increase. Just within the last five months,it has cost us nearly $1,000 more JUST TO MAIL thepaper than it did in the same time period last year. Thisdoes not take into account the increase in first class postage from 22 c to 25 c. All our statements are sent firstclass mail. Other costs have gradually risen.

We have done our best to hold prices down. We havenot raised subscription rates since January, 1985. Wehave not raised advertising rates for the church adssince January, 1984. But while our costs of operation have mounted, our subscription list has gradually declined. Some of our readers are aging and many havepassed away in recent years. Some who paid for lists offriends have had to discontinue that good work. We add new subscribers every month, but within the last year,we have lost more than we have gained.

We do not intend to operate the paper in the red. Ifthere is not sufficient interest in what we are trying todo to sustain it, then we will let the paper die with asmuch dignity as possible.

As much as we regret to do it, as of January 1,1989,the following rates will be in effect: Single subscriptionswill be $11 a year. The club rate will be $9 per year forfour or more. Bundles to one address and group subscriptions will be 12 for $7.50 per month, or 24 for $15.00 per month. Church ads will cost $80 a year.

If we are to remain in business, we need presentsubscribers to remain with us and to help us increaseour circulation. Everywhere we go, we meet people who tell us how much they appreciate the paper. We receivemuch mail to the same effect. While all of that encourages us, we really need your help in circulating the paper. Could you subscribe for your children who are away in college, or in military service? What about that young couple where you worship whom you would like to encourage? Could you afford to send it to a list of 12 friends for $7.50 a month? We can bill you quarterly, or however you prefer.

Friends are valuable assets and this paper has made many friends over the years. We have made some enemies too. But if we ever needed our friends to stand with us, we need you NOW. If you appreciate what we are trying to do, then please stay with us and help uswith new subscriptions if you can.

SIGN-LANGUAGE

QUESTION: 7s it scriptural for a church to hire a brother to translate the sermons of the preacher into sign-language for the deaf? A member opposes this because he says we cannot be sure whether the truth is being translated. Too, what about a woman sitting in the pew and translating the sermon by sign-language to a member ofher family?

ANSWER: The querist has two questions for consideration. The answer to both is: Yes, it is scriptural! Thedeaf need edification from the word of God as much as any other member. What if we attended a church comprised mainly of deaf people, and the preacher spoke exclusively in sign-language? Would not we need, andwant, an interpreter? How would we like it if one of thedeaf brethren opposed an interpreter for us on the basisthat he wasn't sure the truth was being translated?

When preachers move to non-English speaking countries to evangelize, most of the time they need interpreters until they learn the language. Is not this the same inprinciple as having an interpreter for the deaf? How dowe know the truth is being translated by a foreign interpreter, except by the competence of and the trustwe have in the translator? Churches put their confidence in the evangelists they support in foreign fieldsthat truth will be preached, and we ought to do the samewith translators.

How do we who are not deaf know truth is being taught when the preacher speaks in plain English? Byusing our Bibles and proving all things (Acts 17:11; IThess. 5:21; 1 Jn. 4:1). Why can't the deaf do the samething? To oppose sign-language for the deaf for thereason given in the question above is to project all deafpeople as being somewhat stupid; that those who hearhave to decide whether the deaf are receiving the truthor not. This is getting close to self-righteous snobbery.

As to a woman sitting in the pew, translating asermon to one of her family by sign-language, she hasviolated no New Testament principle. She is not exercising authority over men which 1 Tim. 2:12 prohibits.Quietly and subordinately, she is enabling a son ordaughter or grandchild to receive the word of God. Iwonder if a few brethren wouldn't complain if thewoman wrote it down on paper instead of translating itby sign-language. Certainly, such activity should be inan area of the building where it would not distractothers, or done in a manner that would not disturb others.

Paul states,"... seek that ye may excel to the edifyingof the church" (1 Cor. 14:12).

STUDIES IN FIRST AND SECOND TIMOTHY 2 Tim. 1

Second Timothy is evidently Paul's last letter, written from a Roman prison, shortly before his death. Theletter begins with some Personal Facts About Paul and Timothy (v. 1-5)

Paul, as he often did, begins this letter with anaffirmation of his apostleship. There were those who questioned his having the authority of an apostle, so hefrequently affirmed and defended it (See 1 Cor. 9:1-2; 1:1). It was not something he had assumed, or even sought after, but a position for which he was selectedand appointed by God. (See Acts 26:12-18; Gal. 1:11-20; 2:6). The mission God had for Paul was to make men seeand understand "the promise of life which is in ChristJesus."

The letter is written to Timothy, one highly commended, loved, and appreciated by the apostle. He isaddressed as "my dearly beloved son." Timothy's natural parents had given him physical life, but it was Paul,on his first missionary tour, who converted Timothy,enabling him to experience life (spiritual) in ChristJesus. In 1 Tim. 1:2 Paul refers to him as "my own sonin the faith." The Corinthians, who had been begotten byPaul through the gospel (converted) had Paul as theirfather in this sense (1 Cor. 4:15).

Pauls great love for Timothy is declared as he praysfor the grace, mercy, and peace of God and Christ to bewith him. Every remembrance of Timothy called forthsincere prayers of thanksgiving to God for him night andday. Remembering, thinking about, or seeing Timothy gave Paul great joy, and the feeling was mutual. Timothy, evidently openly shed tears at their separation and in manifesting concern for Paul's plight, which was a touching remembrance for Paul. The basis for thisaffection was "the unfeigned faith" that was in Timothy,even going back to his mother and grandmother.

Exhortations to Endurance and Faithfulness (v.6-14)

Let us remember that whatever is involved in endurance and faithfulness is essential to the preacher savinghimself and those who hear (1 Tim. 4:16). Every saintengaged in trying to save self and others must look uponthese exhortations as essentials to his success.

The first exhortation is to "stir up." With Timothy, itwas "the gift of God, which is in thee by the putting on of my hands." In 1 Tim. 4:14 Timothy was told not to neglect "the gift that is in thee, which was given thee byprophecy, with the laying on of the hands of the presbytery." Some believe this "gift" in Timothy was a miraculous gift of the Spirit, bestowed by the laying on of anapostles hands. Timothy may have had such, but thereis no record of such a bestowal, unless in these two passages, or of his using such a gift. This gift in Timothyhad been given him "by prophecy" and the "laying on ofPaul's hands and the presbytery." It could be neglected and stirred up. If you still have access to it, go back andread the previous article on 1 Timothy 4:14. There, Igave examples of being chosen and "put into the ministry" being spoken of as a gift, and of being sent out orappointed to an assigned task being accompanied by the laying on of hands. It is my belief that the "gift" of 1 Tim.

4:14 and 2 Tim. 1:6 is the position of Timothy as a minister of the gospel of Christ. He was given thischarge (position) by prophecy. That is, the Holy Spiritauthorized this appointment of Timothy. It was bestowed with great solemnity, by the laying on of Paul'shands and of the presbytery (Elders of Timothy's homecongregation). It was a gift (position-responsibility) thathe could neglect and stir up.

If this is the "gift" of these verses, then the charge to stir up and neglect not would not only apply to the young evangelist, Timothy, but to every saint engaged inteaching the word to save self and them that hear.Stirring up and neglecting not are essentials to successin this, the greatest of all works.

In discharging this responsibility, there will be occasions and circumstances that may cause fear, timidity,and doubts. God's ministers are to be men who will not succumb to such things. They, with strong faith, conviction, and love for souls must with clear minds (soundthinking) be unwavering (v. 7). We see this spirit manifested many times in the apostle Paul (1 Cor. 15:31-32; Gal. 2:4-5; Acts 17:16-17, 19-30). The true minister ofGod will not be deterred by little financial support,unpopularity, ridicule and slander, even the threat ofsevere persecution. If there is yielding, hesitation, ordoubt manifested, the spirit of a faithful minister isabsent.

Not only is Timothy told to stir up his gift and makemanifest the faith, courage, and love of a faithfulpreacher of truth, but he is next told (v. 8) to "be not ashamed." Two things he is not to be ashamed of, the testimony of our Lord (gospel), and of Paul, a prisoner.

Paul, himself, is an example for Timothy, and all whopreach the gospel, of not being ashamed of it. He plainlydeclared he was not ashamed of the gospel, and told why—"It is the power of God unto salvation to everyone thatbelieveth" (Rom. 1:16). There is nothing in the gospel tobe ashamed of. It's aim is the salvation of lost men. The facts of the gospel make this possible and the preachingof it makes it available to all.

A brief synopsis of the power of the gospel to save and how it does is given in verses 9-10. God does save usthrough the gospel, and the preaching of it, by His grace.

The saving is by God, and the calling (holy because it isof God and calls men to righteousness) is throughpreaching it.

This salvation is not through, or the result of, our works (works which we have done — Tit. 3:5), but "according to his own purpose and grace." God's purposeand grace is something that was eternally purposed — "before the world began." Paul wrote to the Ephesiansabout this "mystery" that was divinely made known tothe apostles and prophets (Eph. 3:9-11). It involved theappearing of Christ, his death, and resurrection, whereby he abolished death, and brought life and immortality to light. Read Paul's description of thegospel he preached, and it's effect in 1 Cor. 15:1-4.

Concerning this gospel, Paul says he was appointed a preacher and apostle, particularly a teacher of theGentiles (v. 11). He was an example to Timothy, and to all, faithfully preaching the gospel in the midst ofdifficulty and persecution. It is something worth suffering for. Timothy, and every preacher of the gospel, needsto be exhorted to "be a partaker of the afflictions of thegospel (v. 8). Paul's imprisonment at the time of hiswriting this letter, because of faithfulness to his appointment, was not something to be ashamed of, on hisor Timothy's part, or anyone else. Faith in the Lord and the consequent hope is enough to banish all fear, timidity, and doubt so that the preacher of the gospel mayfaithfully persevere with confidence of reward in "thatday" (v. 12).

The charge given to Timothy in verse 13 is to "holdfast." The thing he is to hold fast is "the form of soundwords" which thou hast heard of me." Paul had delivered nothing but sound doctrine-the truth of God. He received it directly from the Lord and was divinely appointed an apostle of it (Gal. 1:11-16). The things Timothy had heard (learned) from Paul, he was assured of (2Tim. 3:14), and could be nothing other than "sound words" (doctrine). Timothy, and every preacher of theword must make sure he holds fast this form of sound words if he is to be successful in saving himself andothers. The good thing committed unto Timothy wassound doctrine and the privilege and responsibility topreach it (v. 14). The Holy Spirit in him would be a forceor power in his keeping, holding fast, or being faithful tohis work.

Present Situation (v. 15-18)

The remaining verses of this chapter reflects uponPaul's present situation. He was deserted by "all theywhich are in Asia," including two false teachers by thenames of Phygellus and Hermogenes. Yet, there was onehousehold — of Onesiphorus — that Paul says "oft refreshed me," being "not ashamed of my chains." Thisbrother diligently sought out Paul, in Rome and ministered unto him, as he also did in Ephesus. When Paulprays that "he might find mercy of the Lord in that day"

(v. 18), he was not indicating that, in spite of his ministering, he had sins for which God's mercy would beneeded in the judgment. The context suggests that the mercy implored is the reward of the Christian's faith and works, available to all faithful Christians by God's mercy.

One doesn't have to read statistics from a professionally conducted census to know that many young peoplewho are "raised in the church" are being lost to the causeof Christ. Often by the upper teen years, youth's spiritual interest is practically nil — some of the youth having at one time obeyed the gospel, others not so. If ithasn't happened where you're a member, visit otherplaces and observe the make-up of the congregation.Then make inquiry of the members. It is alarming to see children brought up among Christians be completelylost to the cause of Christ by the time they have reachedyoung adulthood, right at the time when they shouldreally begin to mean so much to the work of the kingdom.It is of no small concern to preachers, to elders, and togodly saints in general. It has been a matter of greatconcern to me for several years, having seen many fromcongregations with which I was working "drop out," andfeeling a sense of total helplessness to do anything toprevent it; all appeals having fallen on deaf ears. And that is to say nothing of the many among my ownrelation who either departed the faith or who neverobeyed the gospel and who now seem untouchable.

What's happening to them? A bit later I want to offera few, perhaps simplistic to some, thoughts as to what ishappening to them.

Often the preacher or the elders, or both, catch a lot of "flack." "He's preaching way over their heads." "He doesn't make it interesting enough for young people.""They don't identify with him." The elders are notplanning enough youth programs." Etc. And by "youthprograms," they don't mean opportunities to study andlearn and apply God's word, but occasions of fun and frolic.

Granted that it is possible that one's preaching may fall short in many areas, but it is not likely, I venture, tobe the cause of the wholesale dropping out of a segmentof people. Admittedly, there may be exceptions. And while agreeing that elders may not always adequatelyfulfill their responsibility as "shepherds of the flock ofGod," a failure to "provide programs for youth" so as to "keep them involved" should not be charged againstthem. At least, if we are really candid about it, these are not really what is happening to our young folk.

You have perhaps seen circulated the results of asurvey reportedly made by several congregations. Theresults showed a definite relationship between the degree of active involvement of the parents in the localchurch and the percentage of their youth who remained faithful. 93% of the children remained faithful where both parents were faithful and active in the local work.Where only one parent was faithful, 73% of the childrenremained faithful. And where both parents were irregular, only 6% of the children remain faithful. One mayquestion whether the survey was "scientifically conducted" or otherwise find fault with it, but we mustsurely admit that such results as those reported reflectcause for concern. It certainly suggests that much rideson family relationships, attitudes, and responsibilities.A few passages of scripture impressing this truth are:Deut. 6:4-15; Psa. 78; Prov. 3:1-4,11-12; 13:1; 23:13-14;Eph. 6:1-4, etc. And these address only a few areas ofthose attitudes and responsibilities.

Some Suggestions as to What is Happening

Permissiveness is happening to youth. In many instances, parents have abdicated their God-given role.They set no firm guidelines, have no definite rules of thehouse, and often allow themselves to be manipulated.Parents are often literally afraid to have firm rules,afraid of the child rebelling. They don't know that loveis not some kind of namby-pamby attitude, but thatthere must be a certain toughness to love, amply shown in the book of Proverbs. It doesn't mean being roguish,tyrannical, or unmerciful in the demands it makes. Butyouth need guidance. They need someone to tell them"how far," some "cans" and "can'ts" with good sound"whys." And in some instances the "why" may be simply"because I said so."

Work is happening to youth. In many instancesyoung people are pushed and shoved into the "job market" without due consideration as to how the job willinterfere with their worship, study, or influences they'll face. None of us want our children to grow up to be lazy-good-for-nothings. We want them to "learn the value ofthe dollar," to know that, at least for most of us, "moneydoesn't grow on trees." But often that part-time job,which may be taking far too much of their time, is duringhours of worship on Lord's Day or during mid-week Bible study and every night of a gospel meeting. Andthen the parents, having allowed, maybe even encouraged it, or in some instances demanded it, wonder why their child no longer is interested in spiritual things.

Materialism is happening to youth. Not only are they being shoved into the work arena to make their"spending money" or to "buy some wheels," but they seeparents who are often more committed to providing "things" than they are to living for the Lord. Frequentlythe parents are recreation crazed, and allow recreational activity to keep them from services of worship and periods of Bible study, or they often put their workahead of worship, especially if "overtime pay" is involved.

Humanism is happening to youth. Like an octopus with its many tentacles, humanism is attackingfrom many directions, approaching from various sources. From very tender years, humanism's erodinginfluences bombard our young people incessantly; and often parents are unaware of it, and in many instancescannot be roused to a sense of concern when told of those influences. Evolution is only one of humanism's tentacles, but it is a powerful one. How can one who isconstantly told that he is but the higher form of lower lifefail to ultimately act the part? It is bound to dilute orerode away spiritual influences unless strong teaching is given to the contrary. "Value clarification" advocatesteach youth there are no absolutes, no real definitivestandard of right or wrong. This being true, what is to beexpected but that he should eventually cast aside the"old fogey" ideas of parents, preachers, Bible class teachers, and elders?

Hypocrisy is happening to youth. Children are very incisive, easily able to discern a sham. When theyrepeatedly see hypocritical behavior on the part ofadults who are in some authority over them, it has itseffect. Elders, preachers, parents, policemen, governmental officials advocating one thing while practicinganother send forth uncertain sounds to youth. Especially in spiritual matters, if they see no real devotion, nodepth of spiritual life, it affects them.

RESULTS OF LOSING OUR YOUNG FOLK

Their souls are being lost unless they can be regained(Lk. 13:3, 5). Salvation is in Christ (2 Tim. 2:10) — tothose who get into (Gal. 3:26-27), live in (1 Jn. 2:6) anddie in Him (Rev. 14:13).

Additionally, the church is being sapped of its vitality. Congregations that are composed almost entirely of"senior citizens" often are extremely difficult to stir up,to "provoke unto love and good works" (Heb. 10:24).(This is not intended as any disrespect for those "seniors." I'm among the number.) But real zeal and spiritualactivity often comes from those who are younger. Oh,how greatly, they are needed!

This perhaps only "touches the hem of the garment," but I believe these matters strike at some "tap root"causes. And I suggest that they are not unrelated to the"survey results" noted early in this article. The questionmust be continually explored and remedies sought.

My dad has often told the story of the time he, as ayoung preacher, was to preach a sermon during a meeting. In addition to a good crowd, sitting in the audiencewere about fifteen fellow preachers. He was "sweatingbullets" and badly needed a word of encouragement. It wasn't long before Floyd Thompson, who was so important to my dad's development as a preacher (and, indirectly, my own), came and sat beside him and saidsimply, "just preach the text." My dad did, and got alongfine. I sincerely believe that if brother Thompson werestill with us he would be compelled to say the same thingto a lot of my fellow preachers, undoubtedly with even more urgency.

I'm concerned about the lack of open Bibles amongChristians listening to preachers and among preacherswho are preaching. While it is not my aim to judgeanyone, I am very concerned with what I perceive to bean approach to preaching (and listening) which, moreand more, seems to place the word of God in the background. I've heard some sermons recently which illustrate the point. In one, I was not required to open a Biblefor the first 20 minutes; in another, one verse wasreferred to, sort of as a "launching pad," and then theBible was closed from that point on. I heard another"sermon" in which the preacher (who had a degree inpsychology) first expressed his opinion about certainproblems in our relationship with God, then quotedpsychological theories to validate his opinion, then threw in a little Bible, presumably to validate thepsychology. If these are examples of "preaching the text," I must admit that I'm very worried about the future of preaching!

We need a fresh reminder of the lesson of Nehemiah 8, where Ezra stood in the pulpit (v. 4) and OPENEDTHE BOOK (v. 5), reading distinctly from it and helped them to understand what the BOOK said (v. 8). If thatdoes not describe our function as "preachers of theword," then I'm at a loss as to what I'm supposed to bedoing as a full-time gospel preacher and teacher.

Of course, I'm not at all sure the problem is all in thepulpit. In fact, I'm pretty well convinced it is not. Ipreached a meeting recently in which the majority ofpeople did not have a Bible in their possession. Since Iwas attempting to present an exposition of one of theminor prophets, needless to say, I was at a disadvantage. I cannot pretend to understand why people of God would enter a building, presumably to hear the word ofGod preached, and not have a Bible with them. What is going through a person's mind? What are they expecting to hear? What do they want to hear? Platitudes? Maxims? Jokes?

God said through Amos, many years ago, that there would be a "famine in the land, not of bread nor a thirstfor water, but of hearing the words of the Lord" (Amos8:11). Such a famine came and the people of Israelsuffered the spiritual consequences. There is no such famine now, except when it is self-imposed. In too manyplaces and in the sermons of too many preachers (one istoo many), such a famine exists. It extends to the pew and people are beginning to get along quite well withoutthe word of God... after all, if we hear only opinions, we have a choice to accept them or reject them, don't we? "My opinion is surely as good as his, though perhaps not as eloquent."

Perhaps I'm sounding an alarm which is not needed(though I know many others who share my concern).Jeremiah said to beware of those who cry "peace, peace when there is no peace" (4:10). These are just myobservations—but if they ring true, in your experience,I'd like to make a couple of short suggestions. To those who occupy the pews each week and listen to preaching,demand (yes, demand) Bible preaching — accept nosubstitutes. In addition, bring your Bibles, open themup, take notes, listen. Challenge the preacher to present the word of God as the only solution to every problemhe presents. We need to be challenged, checked and,sometimes, corrected. And, to my fellow preachers, let's "just preach the text" (2 Tim. 4:2).

TACTICS

The outcome of many battles, even wars, has beendetermined by tactics, and not by sheer strength or theadvantage of superior armament.

The church's mission to advance and defend the cause of truth is compared to a warfare. In fact, it is a warfare,though a spiritual one (2 Cor. 10:4).

I recall hearing brother Frank Puckett say one timeconcerning this warfare with digression, "We let themout-general us." Some brethren have been aware of thetrue issues in every conflict, but others don't realize theyhave been "out-generaled" until it is too late.

In the great digression of the late 1800's and the early1900's, the main issue became instrumental music —not because it deserved to be, but because the advocated of error wanted it that way, and we allowed it.

Missionary societies were an issue, to be sure, but themain battle was pitched on the sentimental issue of the organ. Evidence of this is still seen today.

Some think that the only difference between thechurches of Christ and the Christian Church is the instrument of music. Sadly, some churches of Christhave corrupted their identity to the point where thisconclusion is valid. This condition is a result of tactics.

The instrument has been emphasized to the pointwhere some brethren think that as long as we have theright name on the building and no piano inside, that itmust be a true church of Christ. As a result, all somebrethren need to do in order to be a full-fledge Christian Church is to change the name and put in a piano. Theyalready have everything else.

The principles of establishing scriptural authorityhave long since been covered in the tactical dust createdby digressive brethren.

Some brethren failed to see that the "orphan home"issue was only a red herring, a feint on the part of thecollege-in-the-budget advocates to divert our attention from the real issue. And, some well-meaning brethrenon both sides of the issue were duped. The liberals didthe advance work of the "ultra-liberals" by allowing orphans to become the sentimental issue.

Those who wanted the college in the budget of the church knew that brethren generally were not ready forthat idea. But, the college advocates knew that thehomes and schools would "stand or fall together," so theyjust sat back and waited.

Brethren finally found out that the church wasn't in Jas. 1:27, and that there were few, if any, orphans in the "orphans homes" among us. They also learned (too late),that some homes and schools were included in the same operation, and truly did stand or fall together. Then,some homes changed their names and methods (thehome wasn't a "method" after all), to emphasize "familytype" care instead of "institutional care."

Even the issue of whether a home should be under elders or a board of directors threw some off a trail for a while.

But, by this time, churches were supporting the preschool, the kindergarten, the grade school, the juniorhigh, the high school, and the college.

Some of the "conservative liberals" or "neo-antis" (asthe "ultra-liberals" call them), are still out there wandering around in the dust of battle waving their armsand pens and wondering what ran over them. Some daythey may realize that the college express, the sponsoringchurch, the missionary society, the instrument of musicand a host of other things went by them while they werepreoccupied with "orphan" homes.

In my judgment, we are allowing the same sort oftactics to divert us from the real issues in other areas.

We have allowed the battle over general benevolenceto be pitched at Gal. 6:10 and 2 Cor. 9:13, and especiallyon the italicized word "men" (KJV). It has not yet beenproven that benevolence is even the main considerationof Gal. 6:10, much less corporate benevolence on the partof the church.

The theme of Gal. 6:1-10 is fulfilling the law of Christby bearing one another's burdens (v. 2). The thoughteven originates back in Gal. 5:14ff. There are manytimes when we have opportunity to "do good" wherebenevolence is not even a consideration.

The term "unto all" in 2 Cor. 9:13 must be applied inthe light of other passages which treat on the same class,kind, or group, i.e., believers. References to benevolencein the church at Jerusalem (Acts 2, 4, and 6), Judaea(Acts 11:27-30), and the seven references to the Jerusalem collection (Rom. 15; 2 Cor. 8-9; 1 Cor. 16,1,2), musthave pre-eminence over the italicized "men" of 2 Cor.

9:13.

Even such passages as Jas. 1:5 and other passages which treat on the alien sinner's relationship to Godwould pre-empt the conclusion that the church is obligated to engage in general benevolence toward those notsaints.

Another area where we have been "out-generaled" concerns whether or not a thing is supported "out of thechurch treasury."

While this matter is important, and needs to becircumscribed by the scriptures, there are other ways in which the church can support a thing besides making adirect contribution from its treasury.

The church bus could go get the Methodist choir, letthem perform and be fed in the "fellowship hall," andreturn them to the Methodist Church without ever making a direct contribution to the Methodist Churchout of the treasury. After a thing has been directlysupported in other ways, it is only a formality to then use the church treasury.

If you hear that the enemy without is attacking at a certain point on the perimeter, or that subversives areoperating within, check it out by all means. But let's notmarshall all our forces in one area until we are certain that is where the battle needs to be pitched. It may bejust a diversionary tactic on the part of an adversary todivert our attention from the real thrust.

And, when we are engaged in fighting "the good fightof faith" even at the right time and place, let us not beoblivious to danger in other areas. The Ephesiansseemed to remember part of this advice (Acts 20:28-31),but forgot the rest of it (Rev. 2:1-6).

It is not only important that we have the right causeand the right armor, but let us watch that others do not "out-general" us.

Ezra is a character we often overlook in our study ofthe Old Testament, but he deserves our attention as onewho had great courage in doing a terribly hard job.Maybe he is overlooked because much the same job needs to be done in our time and we do not like to think about it. He had the unenviable job of telling many of the children of Israel that their marriages were not right inGod's sight and ending them was demanded. I fear thatall too many among our brethren today do not have thecourage to fulfill such a task towards those who areliving in adultery.

In Ezra 9, the situation is brought to the attention ofEzra. Those around him tell Ezra that the people had married foreigners thus violating the will of God. Hemourns at the news and sits down confounded for a longtime. It brought great agony of mind for him to knowthat his brethren had transgressed that law of God andstood in jeopardy for such.

In this state of mind, he prays fervently to God. Hisopening words are, "0 my God, I am ashamed and blush to lift up my face to thee, my God; for our iniquities are increased over our head, and our guiltiness is grown up unto the heavens" (Ezra 9:6). It was no small matter inEzra's estimation that the people had unlawful marriages. It was seen as an enormous sin against God. Ezraeven refers to it as "our great guilt" (Ezra 9:13). Inconcluding the prayer, Ezra acknowledges that thepresent condition would cause God to consume themwithout leaving a remnant (Ezra 9:14-15). Notice thathe did not say God would only consume those in the unlawful marriages, but the whole nation who tolerated such! There was no doubt that someone needed to help correct the situation before terribleconsequences ensued.

In Ezra 10, Shecaniah came with a message whichwas both hopeful and horrifying. The hope was found inconvincing the people to admit their sin and put awaythe unlawful relationships as repentance would demand (Ezra 10:2-3). The horrifying part was the charge to Ezra, "Arise, for this matter belongeth unto thee ...;be of good courage and do it" (Ezra 10:4). Things couldnot change with the wave of a magic wand, a strongwish, or even a fervent prayer alone. Someone of couragewould have to stand up and preach an unpopular and heartbreaking message which showed the sin andpointed the way of right. Ezra was the one suited to thetask. Because of his influence as a leader of the people,the matter belonged to him. Shecaniah does not seem tobe passing the buck, but is encouraging Ezra to act forthe good of God's people as the one who could best do the job.

Ezra delivers the message to the people: "Ye havetrespassed, and have married foreign women, to increase the guilt of Israel. Now therefore make confessionunto Jehovah, the God of your fathers, and do hispleasure; and separate yourselves from the peoples ofthe land, and from the foreign women" (Ezra 10:10-11).The people did acknowledge their sin and acted asrepentance has always demanded, ceasing the sin. It was not an easy task for "some of them had wives bywhom they had children" (Ezra 10:44). Several timesduring the episode, Ezra shows the emotional turmoilthis task brought, but he did it anyway. God's law demanded such and failure to preach the message assured punishment from God. He loved God and thepeople too much to shun his duty. Oh how we need men with the courage of Ezra!

The situation which presents itself today is not identical to that of Ezra's time. There is no prohibition on thenationality of those whom we may marry. But there islaw regarding that which constitutes an acceptablemarriage in God's sight today. Jesus sets forward thevery clear ideal of one woman for one man in marriagefor life in Matthew 19:3-8. The one exception is statedwith equal clarity in verse 9: "And I say unto you,Whosoever shall put away his wife, except for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and he that marrieth her when she is put away committethadultery." That law is being violated by multitudes inour day and the violators are increasingly finding theirway into churches across the land without ceasing the sin. They may be a different brand of unlawful marriages than Ezra saw, but the common factor is that bothare unlawful. Would any dare to argue that God wouldlook with greater favor on sexual impurity in our timethan racial or cultural impurity in Ezra's time? Both violate God's commandments, both are sin, and bothbring the punishment of God!

We have those who are named among our brethrenwho preach the guilty party may remarry and be acceptable to God without severing the unlawful union. Wehave some who say that God's law regarding divorce and remarriage does not apply until one is a Christian.Never mind the fact that Jesus said it had been in effect "from the beginning" (Mt. 19:4,8), they say it is only law for the "kingdom." Some say that when you become aChristian the past unlawful marriages are cleansedalong with your sins and you can stay with your presentmate regardless of how many you have had before. Isn'tit amazing how some try to get around the Bible teaching about repentance? Repentance says we must cease the sinful practice, not change the definition of sin. Some say 1 Corinthians 7:15 gives the deserted believer a right to divorce their unbelieving mate andremarry even though adultery has not occurred. If theycan find an exception to the "except" of Matthew 19:9,how long will it take them to figure an exception to the"except" of John 3:3? With teaching like this being done,it is no wonder that people in these situations are foundin churches throughout the country. We ought to hangour heads in shame and blush over these sins as did Ezra of old. We too should confess that our "iniquities areincreased over our head, and our guiltiness is grown up unto the heavens."

Instead, many today are excusing away such falseteaching and sinful practices as matters of "privateconscience." Among those of us who call ourselves"Gospel preachers" we see a hesitancy to label falseteaching and sin in this area for what it is. Excuses andconvenient reasoning do not change one thing — theteachers and practitioners of such error stand in jeopardy of eternal damnation while we refuse to face themwith their error! Love for the Lord, His truth and thesouls of people should constrain us to take a stand. MayGod help us to have the courage to face those in suchjeopardy with the error of their ways regardless of whothey are or the hardship it brings unto us. Oh how we need men with the courage of Ezra!

WORKMAN WORTHY OF HIRE

One of the most noticeable areas of change, for the better, to be sure, among the people of God over the pastnearly forty years of my preaching life, is in preachersupport. This is certainly understandable because monetary values, prices for goods and services, wagesand resultant accumulations have all made for the affluent present. Recognizing our improvements in thisarea of preacher support is not to completely exoneratefailures and shortcomings in many areas and among many congregations. While I recognize the sensitivenature of this area of study, even to the danger of beingjudged self-serving, let me offer what is hoped will besome profitable considerations.

Our premise is clearly scriptural, preachers are to besupported. "Even so hath the Lord ordained that theywhich preach the Gospel should live of the gospel" (1Cor. 9:14). Pay for the laborer in the work of the gospelis as logical and practical as payment for the soldier,planter of the vineyard, feeder of a flock, or oxen in theplowing of a field (cf. 1 Cor. 9:7-9). Some of the practicalareas of support of the preacher (judgment calls, if youwill) are variable and the variations where agreeable tothe principles are justified. However, may I offer for consideration some of these overlooked practical facetsof preacher support.

Surely, we are agreed that a stable relationshipbetween the congregation and the preacher is vital toproductivity. Communication is essential to understanding and discussion to this end ought to certainlyprecede every working relationship in the beginning.Wages, cost of living increase, fringe benefits includingmedical and hospitalization coverage, social securitypayments and various other things ought to be dealtwith up front.

In regard to wages, consider this. A wage figure of$600 per week in 1987 with a cost of living index of 5%becomes $630 in 1988. This is not a $30 raise in fact, buta keeping pace in buying power. What $600 bought in 1987 it takes $630 to buy in 1988. If these factors are notapplied in an escalating economy it becomes plain to seethat a couple of years can easily erode a respectablewage of $600 to the buying power of $540.

In the day of escalating medical and hospital costswith extended illness quite common, what is the responsibility of the congregation when the preacher isbeset by a lengthy or even terminal illness? When hebecomes non-functional or the function is limited, howlong is the church obligated to pay his wages? Or, for that matter, is there an obligation? One church withwhich I am acquainted had addressed this possibility up front with their preacher and has arrived at this commendable program. In the case of extended illness theyare committed to pay the preacher for six months fullwages. The next six months is to be at half wages makingfor some obligation for one year. Their reasoning for the time frame is that social security will take over by thenand any future obligation on the part of the church, (theyreadily admitting they have a continuing responsibility)will be treated as the church's responsibility to a needy saint.

The congregation above has also had the wisdom and foresight to see that the outside preaching activities oftheir preacher are not a financial drain for him. At the end of the calendar year if his meeting or outside the congregation preaching work has left him in the "red"this is taken care of. That is an arrangement in additionto maintaining the regular wage on a weekly basiswhether the preacher is doing local work or outside meeting and teaching work.

Fluctuating medical insurance premiums from onelocality to another makes hospitalization insurance avariable. Major medical coverage is a must and congregations would do well to include this in their support package. After all, for them, it may be the most economical measure in the face of catastrophic illness on the partof the preacher. The importance of this facet of supportfor the preacher is obvious.

Preachers are staying longer in places of their chosenlocal work than in decades past. This is good and healthyin most cases. One of the reasons for this is home ownership. Rather than the church owning a residence,where the preacher must live and pay rent via salarydecrease because he must consider the house in his wages, preachers are buying their own houses. Comingout of a period where living in the preacher house was a foregone conclusion, the first move into home ownershipcan be a struggle. But with an appreciation in real estatevalues, even with a static market, this allows for acushion and a residence for old age among preachers thatin the past were hard pressed. Congregations need torecognize the going practice among corporations as keypersonnel is moved and be aware of relocation expensesas well as the base cost of moving. It is not unheard ofamong some employers to guarantee no loss in the sale ofreal estate due to move.

Someone may be ready to conclude that I am workingfor a cushy situation for every preacher. For the mostpart, the good and faithful preacher deserves every good thing the brethren will provide. But what we intend inthis article is to open the eyes of those who have forvarious reasons become oblivious to the practical. Allowthis summarization. Base wages adequately provided with built in cost of living increases in keeping withnational index figures. Hospitalization insurance either provided or allowance made in keeping with existing rates for locality of residence. Extended illness is a possibility better considered beforehand than after theneed arises. I commend the provisions mentioned in the early part of the article as being workable, compassionate and an understanding solution among brethren.Social security must enter the picture either as anaddition or a decrease to base wages. Quite possibly Ihave overlooked something, but touching these areasis not usually done and is sorely needed.

Contractual formality is not necessary betweenbrethren as they work together in the preacher-congregation relationship. However, a clear understanding ofthe expectations, monetary and otherwise, on bothsides of the relationship is vital. Without entering intoa discussion of semantics, whatever you want to callthe arrangements made, it needs to be clear, specificand exact that minimal misunderstanding develop.Hopefully, we have succeeded in stimulating productive thinking and action in this sensitive area and thatall will profit therefrom.

"Giving Goliath His Due" is a report on the Philistines in archaeology and Bible history, which appearedin the 29 August 1988 Time Magazine (pp. 52-53). It begins,

History has not been kind to the Philistines. Exem

plified by such figures as the hulking Goliath and

the treacherous Delilah, they are depicted in the

Bible as thieves and warmongering aliens. The

ancient Egyptians branded them pirates and ma

rauders. We are told that recent archaeological work at Philistine Ekron reveals "one of the most highly civilizedpeoples of their time. They were successful industrialists and merchants, skilled producers of pottery and metal tools, sophisticated architects and town planners." After commenting on the Philistines' religion,government, agricultural life, and diet, the authorconcludes,

As Hebrew University's Dothan puts it, "The Philis

tines need no longer bear the burden of biblical

scorn." After 3,000 years, Goliath's people are vindi

cated at last.

The Philistines are mentioned in Genesis, Exodus,and Joshua, and are often discussed as having a significant role in the historical records of Judges through 2 Chronicles. The prophets Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Amos,Obadiah, Zephaniah, and Zechariah condemn the Philistines for their pride and decadence. Biblical history shows the Philistines just as skilled, shrewd,and sophisticated as modern archaeologists say theywere. Archaeology confirms and illuminates the biblical record on this matter, just as it has done over andover again on other matters of historical detail.

The Time article tries to peddle the ridiculous assumption that since archaeologists find evidence of skill and sophistication among the Philistines, the Bible account of Philistine violence and moral decay is in doubt.Modern man, like the Philistines before him, is deludedwith the idea that if people are "smart" and "sophisticated" they are not sinful and shameful. Some of the shrewdest and most sophisticated people in history havebeen the most wicked and vile. "Moral progress" to somepeople is "progress" in beating the danger of disease whileliving a life of sexual immorality. Skill and industry tosome people include the ability to lie, cheat, and steal, andto "get away with it." We are slow to learn that scientificadvances do not guarantee moral and spiritual advances.Perhaps scholars will report in the year 5,000 siftingthe remains of music, art, literature, industry, and science from Nazi Germany. The report will begin,

History has not been kind to the Nazis. Exemplified by

such figures as the arrogant Adolf Hitler and his

treacherous band of cronies, they are depicted in an

cient annals as aggressors and warmongers. The an

cient Americans branded them pirates and maraud

ers. Recent archaeological work at Berlin reveals "one of themost highly civilized peoples of their time." After a surveyof the trappings of civilization and sophistication, the author may conclude,

As Dr. Top Scholar at Hebrew University puts it, "Nazi

Germany need no longer bear the burden of Jewish and

world scorn." After 3,000 years, Hitler's people are

vindicated at last.

Yes, it is possible to be both skillful and sinful. Archaeology says the Philistines were skillful. The Bible saysthey were both skillful and sinful. Archaeology and Biblehistory are not at odds here. Archaeology confirms the Bible record without contradicting a single detail recorded in the Bible.

The Bible is accurate, right, and true when it addresseshistorical detail and when it addresses my sin and God'sprovision of a Savior. Those who love the truth are drawn to Christ by "the word of the truth of the gospel" (Col.1:15). He forgives our sins by means of his own blood whenwe believe in him enough to repent of our sins, to confesshis name, and to be immersed in water (Rom. 6:3-4; 10:810). Jesus invites you to come to him as he says withoutstretched arms, "Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free" (Jn. 8:32).

Jesus told the Jews, "Ye are of your father thedevil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abodenot in the truth, because there is no truth in him.When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: forhe is a liar, and the father of it" (John 8:44). Jesussaid that these Jews were more like the devil than Abraham whom they claimed as their father. Theyobviously lived more like devil than like Abraham.

In a comedy routine years ago Flip Wilson said, Thedevil made me do it," and most of us laughed at him. Butwhat he said wasn't strictly true. There is no doubt thatthe devil wants us to sin; to serve him. Jesus told Peter,"behold, Satan hath desired to have you, that hemay sift you as wheat" (Luke 22:31). And it was Peterwho later wrote at the direction of the Holy Spirit, "Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary thedevil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour" (1 Peter 5:8). And while Satan cannot make us sin, he continues to tempt and to deceiveand to use every way within his power to influence us forevil. In the beginning of our study we noted that Jesusidentified Satan as "a liar, and the father of it." Well,Satan is still telling lies that are deceiving men andleading them to destruction. Please look at a few of hislies with me.

YE SHALL NOT DIE —The first recorded lie of the devil occurred in the garden of Eden. God had alreadytold Adam and Eve not to eat of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, "for in the day that thoueatest thereof thou shalt surely die" (Gen. 2:17).Along comes the devil and talks with Eve, and tells her,"Ye shall not surely die: For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall beopened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil" (Gen. 3:4-5). Some have contended that Satan didn't really lie to Eve here, but I believe that he did.Though they did not die physically right on-the-spot,Adam and Eve died in their relationship to God, for sinalways separates us from God (Isa. 59:1-2; Ezek 18:4;Eph. 2:1; etc.). It made no difference that Eve believedSatan; the consequences were the same. She and Adamhad disobeyed God, and they died. Don't be fooled bySatan into believing the same lie that a little sin won'thurt you, that such is just good clean fun.

THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION — The theory ofevolution says that man evolved from lower forms of life.Further, the theory of evolution has no answer for theorigin of life itself. This is frequently explained away by "the big bang theory" and like nonsense. The effect of thetheory of evolution however is something quite different. If man is not made by God, and in the image of God,then there is no one who can judge us; no one to set standards for us to live by. Also, man cannot be regardedas any better than the animals except that he hasevolved to a higher level. Satan would love for you tobelieve the theory of evolution rather than the statement of Genesis 1:27, "So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him,male and female created he them." The theory ofevolution is just another lie of the devil to deceive menand lead us to eternal destruction.

SECULAR HUMANISM — Very much akin to the theory of evolution is secular humanism. It sounds sogood on its face, that we should seek only what is goodfor man, what lifts man up, etc. The problem with thatis that secular humanism denies the existence of God,and the creation made by God. Again, the purpose is todeny accountability on the part of man to anyone higherthan himself. Our children are being fed bits and piecesof this lie of the devil in our public schools. All of this isin spite of the fact that God said, "Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, hisservants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sinunto death, or of obedience unto righteousness(Romans 6:16). We serve whomever we obey, and we willgive an answer for that, for Paul also wrote: "So then every one of us shall give account of himself toGod" (Romans 14:12). Somehow we must counteractthis lie of the devil and be sure that we recognize, and that our children understand that we are answerable to God.

NO RIGHTS OR WRONGS IN SEX — Sex is not bad or dirty or wrong, when kept in the confines of God'sarrangement, marriage. But one of the lies of the deviltoday is that all sex is good, and that there are no "rights"or "wrongs." This idea has been around for a long time,but Jospeh Fletcher, in his book "Situation Ethics" toldthe whole world just to do the "loving thing" and not to be bound by some antiquated code of ethics. Our worldis filled with "sex," and not just in the bedroom, but ontelevision, in movies, in books and magazines. God gaveus the sexual urge, but He regulated it to the marriagerelationship. Can we really believe that God will notjudge or condemn those who refuse His warnings to"flee fornication" (1 Cor. 6:18), or "nevertheless, to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband" (1 Cor. 7:2); or "marriage is honorable in all, and thebed undefiled: but whoremongers and adulterersGod will judge" (Heb. 13:4).

Don't listen to the lies of the devil. He will lead you todestruction if you will let him. Rather let's "trust in the Lord with all thine heart; and lean not unto thineown understanding. In all thy ways acknowledgehim, and he shall direct thy paths" (Prov. 3:5-6).

READ YOUR BIBLE TODAY

Send all News Items to: Connie W. Adams, P.O. Box 69, Brooks, KY 40109

DON GIVENS, 555 University Ave. #3207, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826

— We have now completed three years in Hawaii working with theLeeward church in Waipahu on the island of Oahu. These years havebeen enjoyable, and the Lord willing, my wife and I desire to remainhere working in the gospel. To those brethren planning to visitHawaii, please be informed that the Leeward congregation is the onlynon-institutional church in this state. (The Moanalua church listed insome of the old directories, no longer exists.) Our building is located17 miles west of the tourist district of Waikiki. Therefore, it is essential that all tourists make adequate plans to worship with us,taking this distance in consideration. The Honolulu city bus goes toWaipahu, but it will take you one and a half hours each way. The bestway is to plan on renting a car to drive to Waipahu. A taxi is veryexpensive. We have from 13-18 visitors every Sunday, and it istherefore impossible for us to supply transportation. Our building isabout 45 minutes from Waikiki by car. Directions to the building willbe found in the yellow pages of your phone book in your hotel.Honolulu is a large city of 750,000 population. Our Bible class is at 9

A.M. with worship at 10 A.M. and 6 P.M. Come visit us in the Aloha state.

PATRICK ANDREWS, 1650 Paradise Hill Rd., Clarksville, TN 37043—The South Clarksville church has a mimeograph machine weneed to sell. If you are interested, please call me for details at (615)645-7723.

LEWIS-LANGFORD DEBATE TOMMY L. McCLURE, 3311 Longview Rd., Antioch, CA 94509 — On December 12 and 13, 1988, beginning at 7:30 P.M., Jack W.Langford of Ft. Worth, Texas will affirm: "The Scriptures teach thatbaptism by, with or in the Holy Spirit to the penitent believer is for theremission of sins and placement into Christ and his body, the church,without any other acts of obedience." Harry L. Lewis, Evansville, INwill deny. Place: Placer High School Auditorium, 275 Orange Ave.,Auburn, California.

On December 15 and 16, at 7:30 P.M., Harry L. Lewis will affirm:"The Scriptures teach that baptism (immersion) in water is in order to receive remission of past sins for the penitent, alien sinner." Jack

W. Langford will deny. Place: Veteran's Memorial Building, 6th and

E. Sts., Antioch, CA.

Langford's doctrine is not the usual denominational type. According to him, there is no such thing as water baptism for sinners today;cases of such in the Gospels and Acts were merely carry-overs from the law of Moses during "the period of transition" from the Old to the New; the "one baptism" for today is spiritual baptism, he avers. He is a"Quakerized" dispensationalist, a slick-tongued orator, an experienced debater, a "sarcastic nice guy," and loathes water baptism and the church of Christ. Harry L. Lewis is also an experienced debater,well prepared and highly qualified. This may well be the debate of thedecade with sectarians.

Lodging in Auburn (are code 916), includes: The Auburn Inn

(800) 272-1444, Best Western Golden Key (800) 528-1234, The Auburn Hotel 885-8132, Elmwood Motel 885-5186. Motels in Antioch (area code 415), descending price scale, are: Heritage Inn 778-2000, All Seasons Inn 754-6600, Astro Motel 757-6100; Motel « 427-1600.

Our radio program (A Program of Bible Truth) will be heard onRadio Station KPLA, 770 AM dial, at 7:45 A.M. each Sunday.

APPEAL FOR A FAMILY IN CRISIS

WARREN E. BERKLEY, P.O. Box 113, Highlands, TX 77562 — Inthe spring of 1985, brother Luther White was diagnosed as a victim ofcancer (multiple myeloma). Despite pain, tremendous financial burdens, and periodic side effects from the treatment, brother White continued to operate his concrete construction business, maintaininghis insurance but receiving little personal salary. In the fall of'87, his brethren at the Wallisville Rd. church of Christ began benevolentassistance for him and his family. This was started after all other (family) resources were exhausted. After taking that step, otherchurches in the Houston and southeast Texas area responded withextraordinary generosity. These funds have helped sustain the Whitefamily, and throughout the past 10 months, brother White has continued to work.

Now (August, '88), brother White is no longer able to work. He facesthe threat of insurance cancellation. And, may I add, that during thepast two years, his wife has had major surgery, and his teenage daughter wears a heart pacemaker. Medical bills now owed are in excess of $250,000. It is time to broaden the appeal for help. All threemembers of the White family are faithful members of the WallisvilleRd. church. The relatives have done all they can; the local church isdoing all it can; area churches have been helping; Sister White worksfull-time. Hence, the only other avenue of approach left is this appealto churches and individuals throughout the nation.

Contributions may be sent to: Wallisville Rd. Church of Christ,

P.O. Box 113, Highlands, TX 77562. (Mark checks: "White Benevolence"). All contributions will be acknowledged the same day they arereceived. For more information you may contact me at (713) 426-7760or 426-8034.

OBITUARY

CHARLES L. MORTON of Ratcliff, Arkansas — "It is with deepsadness that I learned of the untimely death of Charles L. Morton,faithful and able gospel preacher, and a trusted, beloved personalfriend of many years. His death resulted from an accident, whichusually would not have been serious at all — he stumbled and fell,hitting his head and resulting in a blood clot, requiring brain surgery.Being a diabetic further complicated matters, From the time of theaccident until his death, Charles never regained consciousness. Otherblood clots and complications followed. He was in the intensive careunit for the entirety of his hospitalization at Fort Smith, AR." (Paul

C. Keller in PAUSE -PONDER-PROFIT, Paragould, AR)

Funeral services were conducted by Harold Turner and MikePittman. His preaching carried him to Colorado, Kansas, Louisiana,Oklahoma, Texas, Minnesota, Alaska and Arkansas. Mike Pittman reported that between 1976 and 1983, over forty articles from brotherMorton appeared in THE PRECEPTOR, though most of these were not submitted by him personally. As Pittman said "They wereshort, clear, and to the point."

Brother Keller's report also indicates that brother Morton had paid high insurance premiums for years, only to have the company declare itself insolvent, defaulting on payments owed, and forcing notonly the loss of premiums paid but also the accumulation of highmedical bills. His widow and children are left with medical bills in excess of $50,000, according to brother Keller. Our sympathies are expressed to his wife, Sylvia and children. She may be addressed at Rt.1, Box 233, Ratcliff, AR 72951.

PREACHERS NEEDED

VALPARAISO, FLORIDA — The Twin Cities church, 92 Eastview Ave. (32580) is looking for a preacher. We are a small congregation of20 members. We own our building. Outside support may be needed.Phone 892-4736 or 678-4629.

KAHOKA, MISSOURI — The Westside church, which meets at 671

W. Thompson St. (63445) is seeking a second man to locate here in

N.E. Missouri to work with Lonnie Garrison in preaching and teaching the gospel. There are 17 members, most of whom are women. Butthere is much to do. It is 100 miles in all directions to another faithful work. The work is challenging for either a younger or older man. Onlyserious inquiries need apply. Contact Lonnie Garrison at (816) 7273285 or 727-3006.

POET'S CORNERSONG OF THE LAWLESS(For those Who Disdain Bible Authority)

Free! FREE from God's Law,O Blessed condition,I can sin all I want,And still have remission!

OUT with rules and regulations!OUT with laws and stipulations!We want NO NEGATIVES, let us make clear,Unless it be the ones WE like to hear.

Give us thrills, chills, and scratch our itching ears,Watch us become more sectarian all through the years.No more long and hard Bible study,We think that is much too fuddy-duddy.

Give us fun, food, and frolic; over that we'll drool,But give us Book, Chapter, Verse, and we'll call you a fool.Give us church dinners, and over them we'll slobber,But give us sound doctrine, and on it we'll clobber.

Give us emotional services, and well shout HALLELUJAH!Ask for our Bible authority, and well say "What's it to ya?"We are full of love, and of sweetness we boastBut tell us we're wrong, and YOU we will ROAST!

Shame, shame on those strict Christians,Who follow God's commandments right through.We want NONE of those old restrictions,OUR HEROES ARE NADAB AND ABIHU! —Don Givens

PREACHER AVAILABLE DAVID JOYNER, 1655 Hwy 18, Medon, TN 38356 — I am 37 yearsold, married with two young children and have been preaching for 10 years. I have done evangelistic work in several states. References can be supplied. I would like a full-time, self-supporting work soon.Call (901) 427-8298.

NEWS ITEMS AND STS

The fact that an item appears as news in this paper does not mean that the paper or the editor knows all the details surrounding such areport, nor does it imply endorsement of any service mentioned, noractivity described. We have tried to avoid items which could be construed as commercials for business enterprises. At times we havecarried items of general information which we felt would be of interest or use to readers. In the July, 1988 issue of this paper a news item appeared under the heading of "Project Help." Since that item appeared, planned seminars in both Louisville, KY and Tampa, FL havebeen advertised in letters to preachers in those areas, making reference to the news item in this paper in July. We have requested thatno further reference be made to this paper in future advertisementsand have been assured that this request will be respected.

One of the partners of "Project Help" is Glen Crowe. We quote herea news story which appeared in the Louisville, KY newspaper:

CHURCH INVESTMENT PROMOTER NAMED IN FRAUD INDICTMENT

"For two years, Osybon Glen Crowe traveled to Churches of Christaround the country, promoting his 'Christian' investment business and quoting the Bible to underscore his claims, say those familiar withthe now-defunct Ministers Investment Corp.

"Many — including Ruth Connell, who heard Crowe speak at a church in Conway, N.H. — invested money with Crowe — a Church of Christ minister then based in Tompkinsville, KY.

"But Connell became one of about 300 investors who lost their money when Crowe's business collapsed in 1983, said her lawyer,Charles English Jr. of Bowling Green.

" 'She's devastated,' said English, whose client claims a loss of $141,000. 'It's a very sad story — she lost her whole life savings.'

"Crowe, who now lives in Lebanon, Tenn., was indicted yesterday by a federal grand jury in Louisville and charged with fraud inconnection with his business, which allegedly took in about $1.4million." (COURIER-JOURNAL, November 17,1987, p. Al).

EDITORIAL LEFT-OVERS HOW TO TREAT YOUR WIFE

An older sister in Port Arthur, Texas told us something whichevery married man needs to consider. She said "If a man has enoughhorse sense to treat his wife like a thoroughbred, she will never turninto a nag." Good advice. Are you listening, fellows?

CATHOLIC RELICS

Every time I go to Italy, I am astounded all over again at theabsurdity of some of the legends which the Roman Catholic Churchpalms off on its adherents. For instance, in the city of Rome, there aretwo separate Catholic Churches each of which claims to have the skeletal head of John the Baptist among the relics. You did not knowthat John the Baptist had two heads?

While in Italy in May of this year, we visited the Church of Three Fountains, located on the outskirts of Rome. This is the legendary siteof the execution of the apostle Paul. The story goes that when the axefell and severed Paul's head from his body, that his head bouncedthree times and that at each place where his head struck the ground, afountain burst forth, hence the Church of the Three Fountains. As myfriends, Roberto Tondelli, is fond of saying, "Incredible"!

ELDERS AND FINANCIAL RECORDS

For sometime, the Sixth and Izzard church (a large institutionalchurch) in Little Rock, Arkansas, has been in legal battle over theright of members to examine financial records of the congregation,including salaries of preachers and staff and a $600,000 Polish ReliefFund and how it was distributed. One of the deacons, himself an attorney, took a leading part in the conflict against the elders. A lowercourt ruled that since the congregation is incorporated under the lawsof the State of Arkansas, it was subject to the laws which involve financial disclosure to members of incorporations. The elders wereordered to make the records available. They refused to do so and the case was appealed to the Arkansas Supreme Court which has nowruled that it was a church matter and not subject to court action. One ofthe Justices issued a strong dissent in which he said the court had"mollycoddled the dominant faction" in this church dispute. The wholeaffair is sad. Elders have a God-given right to lead a flock, but not to"lord it over" the flock (1 Pet. 5:2-4). You would think that devout men would take care in "providing for honest things, not only in the sight ofthe Lord, but also in the sight of men" (2 Cor. 8:21). People will notforever follow leaders whom they do not trust. A proper flow ofinformation is essential to such trust. Elders everywhere would dowell to remember this principle.

JUST TO WARM YOU HEART

The first Sunday we were in Itlay in May, I preached at Aprilia,about 40 miles from Rome, where Rudolfo Berdini preaches. Thatafternoon we witnessed the baptism of a 50-year-old man who wasbaptized by his son (who is fast developing into a gospel preacher). The next night we saw this new Christian and his wife at a meeting inLatina. His wife said to my wife "Last night I was so happy I could notsleep. I kept looking at my husband and saying to myself 1 have a husband who is a Christian, I have a husband who is a Christian.' " I am sure there are some sisters who read these lines who can understand just how she felt.

IN THE NEWS THIS MONTH

BAPTISMS 277

RESTORATIONS 65

(Taken from bulletins and papers

received by the editor)