THE UNIQUE CLAIMS OF THE BIBLE

The Bible makes certain claims that are completelyabsurd to the human race if it is not the Book of God. These claims are beyond any other writing and it makes no apology for the claims.

1. CLAIMS TO BE INDESTRUCTIBLE

The Bible claims to be a book that cannot be destroyed intime or eternity. It submits to no power but claims to survive all enemies. Jesus said the heavens and earth will pass away but my word will not pass away (Matt. 24:35).Peter asserts that the word of God will live and abide for ever (I Pet. 1:21). Every type of opposition knownhas been flung against the Bible with all its power but thisbook has come out victorious over all.

2. CLAIMS TO ALL-SUFFICIENCY The word of God will completely furnish every man untoevery good work (II Tim. 3:16,17). It contains everything that pertains unto life and godliness (II Pet. 1:3). Itcontains all truth delivered from God to man (John 16:14).It has been once for all delivered to the saints (Jude 3). The Bible will do all for mankind that God wants done. It is the final authority in all matters. It is perfectly adaptable to allmen in all ages. No other book can serve all generations of

men as does the Bible. It lacks nothing and supplies all things for all men of all nations and times.

3. CLAIMS TO PERFECT LITERATURE The Bible claims perfection in literature. It possesses certain qualities that distinguish it from all other writings known. It contains every type of literature known to man. It was reported that Benjamin Franklin, who was ambassador to France, was invited to a French

Literary Society of Infidels. It was the rule of the club thateach member would

write an original story and submit it to the criticism of the

other members. When Mr. Franklin's time came he copied

by hand the entire book of Ruth and read it to the assembly.

When he had finished he received the applause of the whole

group. They pronounced it a master-piece and asked for

permission to publish it to the world. Mr. Franklin replied

that he could not grant such permission because it was

already in print — in the Bible. Before they learned that it

came from the Bible they claimed it was the "best love story

in the world."

The Bible contains poetry, biography, law, history,

prophecy, and love stories. No literature is so pure and

complete as the Bible. It is at once the most profound and

yet the simplest of all writings. It never grows old with the

passing of time.

4. CLAIMS TO CONTAIN THE HIGHEST PURPOSE The Bible serves a different purpose to most books com posedby men. Most other books are given to gratify thepassions of men, either for knowledge or entertainment, butthe Bible is given to curb and control these passions and toprepare the soul for eternity.

The Bible presents man as a sinner and unfit for his entrance into heaven. Other books tell of man's virtues,but the Bible points out the weaknesses of all men alike,even the greatest men of the world. Noah's intoxication is recorded ; Abraham's weakness in telling Pharaoh that Sarah was his sister to avoid punishment; David's transgression with the wife of Uriah is recorded; Peter's denial of the Lord is given in detail. The Bible is completely impartial in its account of the history of mankind.

It is also a purpose of the Bible to give the promise ofrewards and punishments to those who keep or do not keepits laws. No man can promise rewards beyond his own imaginations and expectations. Neither could this be so inpunishments. Its purpose is to guide mankind into a righteous way of living to avoid the punishments stated and to gain the rewards promised.

The demands and claims of the Bible show its purpose. Itclaims to control the hearts and lives of all men of all nations without a single apology. No branch of human philosophy has ever thought of such a demand.

5. CLAIMS TO BE FOUNDATION OF CHRISTIANITY Nothing can survive if the foundation is destroyed. TheBible is the foundation of Christianity because it gives thelaws and rules for such. Without the Bible Christianitycould not exist. No other book has such an influence on the spiritual welfare of all men.Christianity is not self-evident, as some have thought.

There must be some revelation of its nature and workingbefore men can believe. Parts of the Bible serve this purpose, as John states in John 20:30,31. The Christ of Christianity must be known. The gospels are designed to dothis. Some claim that Jesus was a pure moral man of the highest standing, but deny that he was divine. This claim isabsolutely impossible. How could a man be pure morally and be the grossest impostor of all history ? Christ claims to bethe Son of God and eternal with the Father. If he is not this he is an impostor and does not deserve to be the founderof Christianity.

6. CLAIMS TO BE THE BASIS OF FAITH AND HOPE The Bible claims to be the very foundation and source of alltrue faith and hope. Man is such a creature that he needs laws to govern him. All who believe in God believe that ifHe created him he gave a law to govern him. This law is byChrist. As the sun is the source from which all light in theuniverse comes, so is Christ the source of all light of ourmoral and spiritual being. Remove Christ from the moral and spiritual system and there remains no hope for the soul. Our whole life and all of our daily conduct is predicatedupon faith. We take medicine of which we are completelyignorant because we have faith in the doctor who prescribesit and the druggist who compounds the prescription. Eitherof them are likely to err. We ride in airplanes and automobiles at the hands of others because we have faith in them, but they often err. With the Bible we know its author is never subject to error or mistakes. In many cases today large numbers have been overcomeby false teachers in wolves clothing — teaching anti-Christian philosophy. The Bible will expose these teachersand establish anyone in the faith. "Faith cometh byhearing, and hearing by the word of God" (Rom. 10:17).No man goes out to save souls unless he really believesthe entire Bible to be the word of God, and uses it to establish himself in the faith. Very few people seem to reallybelieve the Bible with their whole hearts, and fear its precepts and doctrine. Even in the church its laws and demands are treated with almost contempt in some cases.God never requires men to believe without sufficient

evidence (John 15:22,24). The Bible offers sufficient evidence to all who will investigate its claims.

BAD COMPANY

"Be not deceived: evil communications corruptgood manners" (1 Cor. 15:33). Several other translations read "bad company" in place of "evil communications." This passage is often pressed intoservice to show that we ought to associate with people and practices which will elevate rather thantear down our character. While this is true, thecontext of this statement has to do with the corrupting influences of false teachers; in this case,those who taught error on the resurrection of thedead. "Now if Christ be preached that he rose from the dead, how say some among you that there is no resurrection of the dead" (verse 12)? The "some among you" of verse 12 are the "bad company" ofverse 33. The resurrection of Jesus Christ is central to the gospel system. If it is not to be trusted thennone of the rest of it makes any difference. Indeed, asPaul said "And if Christ be not risen, then is ourpreaching vain, and your faith is also vain. Yea, and we are found false witnesses of God . . . And if Christ be not raised, your faith is vain; ye are yet inyour sins. Then they also which are fallen asleep inChrist are perished. If in this life only we have hopein Christ, we are of all men most miserable" (vs. 1419).

It is this hope which purifies us (1 John 3:3). Theabsence of this hope would therefore promotedefilement. Moral conduct is rooted in basic doctrinal truth. Paul said "If after the manner of men I foughtwith beasts at Ephesus, what advantageth it me, ifthe dead rise not? let us eat and drink; for tomorrowwe die" (1 Cor. 15:32). False teachers are not goodcompany for any who want to serve God. Paul instructed Timothy to "withdraw thyself from thosewho do not consent to "wholesome words, even thewords of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrinewhich is according to godliness" (1 Tim. 6:3-5). Ofthis number were Hymemaeus and Philetus whose"word will eat as doth a canker" and which would result in overthrowing the faith of some (2 Tim.2:17-18). John said one should not bid "God speed"to those bringing contrary doctrine "for he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds"(2 John 9-11). Apparently, we have some brethrenwho have been deceived on this point. But Paul said"Be not deceived."

There are some among us who decry the charge of"guilt by association." They do not want to be identified with the error:, of those whose companythey keep. They are critical of brethren who opposeand expose, for instance, the views associated withCarl Ketcherside, Leroy Garrett, Edward Fudge and others of their persuasion. They do not want to beconsidered guilty by association, but they seem toprefer that association. Brethren who want their material to appear in such journals as MISSION,INTEGRITY, or THE ENSIGN FAIR, surroundedby the offerings of Leroy Garrett, W. Carl Ketcherside, and the bitter froth from the pens ofmalcontents and modernistic snobs will please excuseme if I do not take very seriously their denials of acceptance of the very views with which their own writings may most comfortably appear.

You can tell a great deal about a man by those hechooses to commend. We have recently read a seriesof articles in one such journal having to do with "Justification." In it the writings of R. L. Whitesidein his comments on the book of Romans have been reduced to ashes (or so the writer seems to feel) whilethe comments of G. C. Brewer, K. C. Moser and present-day liberals have been held up as much moredesirable. One thing Whiteside intended by hiscommentary on Romans was to off-set the Calvinistictendencies of K. C. Moser's book on THE WAY OF SALVATION. We are not surprised that neo-Calvinists among us feel uncomfortable with it.

And what of those who delight in filling speakingengagements at activities where unscriptural practices are featured? Do they take advantage of theopportunity to expose the error or does the activityclose with all thinking these were all in accord? Is itnot yet possible to have our good "evil spoken of?

It is still a time to "watch and pray" for some whoprotest loudly that they have been misunderstood, mistreated and misrepresented, and who still want to"go in and out and find pasture" among faithfulbrethren, have an entirely different spirit. How do weknow this? Just watch the company they keep. Howlong are brethren to allow wolves to circulate amongthe sheep without at least calling them what theyare?

THE PHILIPPINE RELIEF

As soon an news reached us of the earthquake andtidal wave which wrought such damage to Mindanaoin areas where many brethren lived, we urged brethren through these pages to stand by with assistance. The first reports we received were from the Pagadian City area. I received letters from D. L.Aenlle, Ramon G. Carino and Eduardo Ramiro. Theyall said essentially the same thing. It was then tooearly to get the complete picture but it was alreadyevident that much damage had been done and thatmany saints had been affected. Later, a letter camefrom Isabelo Hayuhay of Manila who made a tripinto the damaged area just a few days after the tragedy struck. He feared the worst and was afraidthat unless an observation was offered from someone outside the damaged area, the brethren would notfully comprehend the extent of damage and would not

provide enough help. In this paper we listed the names and addresses of brethren Aenlle, Carino andRamiro as brethren in that area personally known tous who would serve as messengers of churches andindividuals who wanted to send relief to those in their area and to other areas as soon as possible.

In addition to what Wallace Little, Cecil Willis,Larry Hafley, Earl Robertson and others who have preached in the Philippines wrote, I also wrote eachof the three men named telling them that brethrenhere would spread the word as best we could andurging each of them to keep accurate records of allhelp sent and how it was distributed. I have reason to believe that about $40,000 was sent from concerned individuals and churches. We knew all the damage was not in that one area. We waited and waited until we could hardly bear the anxiety, hoping to hear from brethren in Cotabato where more damage was done and where there are many brethren.Since we did not hear for so long, most of the relief was rushed to the Pagadian City area with instructions to share it with those brethren in need wherever they lived. The church at Expressway inLouisville (where the editor is a member) sent its helpthrough the hands of Ramon G. Carino who gave agood accounting of all funds received and disbursed.We have heard no complaints about relief sent through either Ramon Carino or D. L. Aenlle. By far,the largest amount was sent through Eduardo Ramiro, at least $29,000 that we know about. Once relief began to be sent and the need became so widelyknown, it was difficult to get brethren to stop sending. I personally asked some churches NOT tosend anymore when some called to inquire. Long after the need was more than met, brethren continued to call me and others who had preached in the Philippines for advice on the matter.

Since I recommended in this paper that these men were trustworthy and would give an accurate accounting, I also feel obligated to report on someirregularities touching some of the relief sent throughEduardo Ramiro. About $24,000 of that sent throughhim has been properly accounted for and all shouldrejoice in the generous hearts of brethren throughoutthe country who were touched by the plight of theirbrethren in another land. This refutes the oft-repeated falsehood that the so-called "anti" brethrendo not believe in benevolence.

But about $5,000 has not been properly accountedfor. Some of the Filipino brethren themselves firstbegan to point out some questionable thingsinvolving relief distribution on the part of EduardoRamiro. Wallace Little checked into the charges whilehe was there earlier this year. Brother Ramiro turnedover to him all receipts and records he had on this foran audit to be made by a CPA. In this issue we carrythe results of that audit and some conclusions drawn by brother Little. We could not in good conscienceforbear carrying this information in view of our earlier recommendations. Read his report carefully.Let us all pray that brother Ramiro will correct hiswrongs in this matter. He is a very able man and hasdone outstanding work in the past.

At one point, some of us who had preached in thatnation were so distraught over fears we had for our brethren in the stricken areas, that Arnold Granke and I considered personally going to carry relief frombrethren here and to assist in the distribution, should brethren here wish to use us for that purpose. Brother James P. Needham suggested that it mighthave been better had some of us gone. Perhaps so.But even so, we would still have been dependent onbrethren there to assess each need. We hope thatnone will conclude that all relief was misused for it was not. The suffering of brethren was greatly relieved. Let us thank God for this. It would be grossly unfair to become suspicious of ALL Filipinopreachers and brethren. We believe a wrong has beencommitted by brother Ramiro and that he has notonly acted dishonestly but has also compromised theconfidence which many good brethren placed in him,the editor included. Now let us all pray for his repentance.

On 17 August 1976, shock waves from an earthquake centered in the ocean southwest of the Philippines brought great devastation to the island of Mindanao. Triggered by the quake, three giant tidalwaves smashed into the coast of Zamboanga del sur,including Pagadian City. The first hit about 1:10

a.m. when most folks were asleep. The destructionwas almost beyond description. In the city itself morethan 4000 people were reported dead or missing andpresumed dead. According to the PhilippineGovernment, the final loss for the whole area wasover 40,000.

Eduardo Ramiro, the preacher for the Kawit congregation in Pagadian City wired the US for help.The message, as relayed to me through several, was:"Need help; tidal waves killed more than 100 saints,"Several of us solicited benevolence. $29,917.71 I knowof was sent to Eddie for distribution to needy saints. My report deals with this sum. Additional funds weresent to several other preachers, and perhaps toRamiro also.

Later Cecil Willis and I received complaints againstRamiro from a number of Filipino preachers. Theyaccused him of misusing the funds. Specifically, hewas charged with: (1) trying to purchase property on the high ground in the town, to build a "new, modernchurch building"; (2) buying pictures of the dead toaid in raising funds from the US when in fact not asingle saint had been killed; (3) purchasing buildingmaterials to construct this "new, modern church building"; (4) persuading the Kawit brethren to usesome of the money to repair their building instead of for their own benevolent needs; (5) financing abrother in business by purchasing the cloth this brother needed to open a tailor shop; (6) buyingseveral hectars of rice land for himself; (7) using someof the money to pay off his personal debts, especiallyfor his furniture.

These were grave charges. They needed checking.Those from whom I solicited benevolent funds and others who had also contributed to these, and assisted me on the expenses of my recent preachingtrip there asked me to investigate. There was nopersonal joy in this; Eddie Ramiro is my friend aswell as my brother in Christ. None have treated mewith more hospitality than did he and his wife Sol.

Results Of My Investigation

First, on the charge he said, "More than 100 saintsare dead.": Eddie's copy of the cable did not saythis. The brethren who received it do not remember it saying that. When he made the appeal, there hadbeen more than 100 confirmed deaths in that area (first reports were sketchy) with many more confirmed later. This might have caused the confusion, by having to pass through several to reach me.

Second, concerning buying pictures of the dead:Eddie says, and is backed by American brethren: hewas asked to send pictures because these would helpget the needed benevolence. Eddie's remark, holding the pictures in one hand and checks in the othersaying, "Without these (pictures), you don't getthese (checks)." Seems understandable in light ofthis.

Third, of the three men who accused him of askingthem to negotiate for the property in town for the"new, modern church building": None supported hisstatement by independent witnesses. Romulo B. Agduma stated publicly Eddie had sent him a handwritten letter announcing his intention to buildthis "new, modern church building". Eddie deniedthis in front of ten or more witnesses. Romulo was unable to produce the letter at that time. After Eddieand the others had returned to their homes in another province, Adguma found the letter. I HAVE IT INMY POSSESSION NOW. It says exactly what Agduma claimed, thus also partially verifying thecharges made by the three brethren above.

Fourth, Eddie admitted persuading the Kawit brethren to divert part of the benevolence to repairtheir building. He also admitted having purchased atruck load of building materials, but claimed he soldit back when he received rebuking letters from Ceciland myself (October 1976). I was present when hepublicly confessed sin in these, asking forgiveness ofthe Kawit congregation. Further, he did write someUS brethren who had sent him benevolent funds, and after-the-fact asked their permission to repair the building, admitting he should have done so in advance. I read two letters from US churches giving him permission, provided the benevolent needwas satisfied first.

Fifth, on the boat back to Pagadian City after theconfrontation in Agduma's house, in anger and hurtEddie threatened the three who claimed he had sought their assistance in negotiating for the property for the "new, modern church building". The threat was to take them to law for libel. Later, helikewise threatened Agduma.

Sixth, Eddie freely offered me the receipts for disbursement of the funds, with his written permission to have them audited. This was to account for the $29,917.71.

Seventh, the sum of money was so large Eddie wasoverwhelmed and did indeed plan to misappropriateat least some of these funds. After letters from Cecil and myself, and possibly others, he had second thoughts. He appeared sincere in his public confession for urging the Kawit brethren to misuse themoney for building repair. He displayed a lack ofwisdom both in what he said and how he said it in connection with the pictures of the dead, and inrefusing (substantial) help to needy saints beyond thePagadian City area, when their situation was at leastas serious as that of the Pagadian brethren. Eddie liedin the public confrontation in Agduma's house and sinned when he threatened to take the brethren to law.

Eighth, according to the Auditor's report, Eddie has some accounting to do. There is more than $5000.00 unaccounted for IN ANY MANNER. Next, while his control over those funds obviouslyand unquestionable used for benevolence was good, it was entirely unsatisfactory in all "gray areas". Thousands of pesos (nearly 25,000.00) were spent forwhich the receipts were so vague as to be impossible even to guess what was purchased. One receipt alone was for more than P19.000.00. The coincidence between this and the oft-repeated, "Eddie went toCebu City and bought P20.000.00 worth of cloth toset up another brother in a tailoring shop" is great,and demands an explanation. I found no conclusiveproof he did spend the money in this manner, but thesimilarity of amounts and timing to the charge are soclose that without a complete explanation, suspicionwill hang over him. He was charged with purchasingseveral hectars of rice land for himself. No positiveproof was found, but the amount of money for whichthe receipts were so vague as to defy understandingby the Auditor, plus the still-unaccounted for fundswould have been more than enough to pay for thisland. This also cries out for an explanation. The Auditor found no evidence in the receipts that Eddieused the money to pay his furniture debts.

Ninth, I sent a copy of this article to Eddie. Hisresponse, minus repetitive, personal and unrelateditems, appears below:

Eddie's Reply

"I received your letter and I am grateful for theencouragement and your concern for my soul. Isincerely appreciate the way you conducted yourpersonal investigation of the charges laid against me,how I distributed the benevolent funds sent through me by the churches and American individuals. It isonly natural on your part to distrust me and call medishonest in handling the funds because of those whoreported me to be such. But I have some of the receipts of the money I received from the individualchurches in your nation. As benevolence is still goingon, considering that funds did not arrive at the sametime, so some of these who extended help for the poorsaints will also be receiving receipts corresponding tothe amount they sent.

"There might be some misunderstanding on thefunds entrusted to me by the churches and individuals because many times we gave money orgoods to those who were very badly in need withoutgetting receipts from them. Some preachers and churches as requested by the sender to be given assistance have not submitted to me the receipts asto the recipient of the funds that were handed tothem for the needy victims in their locality. I did notreceive any instructions from the churches and individuals that sent the funds to insure receiptsevery time distribution was made.

". . .I am flattering brother (I think he means "kidding"—whl) brother Agduma in fact there is notruth we ever construct a 'modern building'. Wepurchased materials not for a new church buildingbut to repair the damaged portion of the old buildingand to add additional room connecting the oldbuilding due to the abrupt increase in attendance.

"Brother Wally, I was not threatening the fourbrethren but decided to bring the case in court. Butbecause of your advice per your telegram when youwere in Cotabato, Marbel area, I immediately gaveup my plan for litigation.

". . .Also some of the receipts of purchases havenot been kept and some more were destroyed whenour helper washed them with my pants. Anyway some receipts had been sent to the sender corresponding to the amount they sent."

The next paragraph stated, some benevolence wasin kind rather than money. Then he continued: " ... In fact I still have some bundles of receiptspurchased after you left Pagadian City. Should youlike that I will send them to you?. . . .". Later, heagain denied any guilt.

I believe Eddie has plenty of repenting and publicconfessing to do, unless he provides an accurate explanation and accounting of the unreceipted fundsSOON. You may draw your own conclusion.

I weep.

(EDITOR'S NOTE: Stanley W. Adams is the nephewof the editor and son of J. Wiley Adams who writes acolumn for this paper. He attended Florida Collegefour years and preached two years for the Bloomfieldchurch in Macon, Georgia, supporting himself byworking for a furniture company. He and his lovelywife, Carla, are now working with the church at Alabaster, Alabama, the congregation with which thelate Frank Smith labored. They moved to this newwork without assurance of full support. The work is off to an excellent start. At last report Stanley is still short about $200 a month in needed support. We commend his first article to our readers.)

WHERE ARE THE RUTHS

Upon writing this article, I have considered manythings that are occurring, and have been occurring,throughout the past ten years or so. I write this article realizing that my years are young and perhapsothers can say it better and more scholarly. HoweverI feel strongly that much teaching needs to be donenot only on the need for Christian women to be goodChristians but also for Christian men to be likewise. At this time I wish to direct my thoughts to theChristian women.

In reading the book of Ruth one is most surelytouched by the statement of Ruth to Naomi in Chapter 1 and verse 16. The devotion of Ruth toNaomi is indeed touching. Orpah decided to go backto her homeland. She went her way. Ruth's exampleof devotion to the only family she had is somethingwe all should duplicate in our lives. We live in asociety that is always in a hurry. Devotion to familyis looked upon by many as weakness. Husbands gotheir way, wives go their way and the children are reared by whoever is around at the time. Often timesin the quest to be "somebody" families become nothing. After years of striving to be "somebody"husbands wake up and wonder, "where did I gowrong?" Mothers wonder, "Where have I failed?" Inthe very years when husbands and wives should bebuilding a home, selfishness overtakes them. They may be successful in accumulating worldlypossessions but what about building a foundation oflove and mutual respect that will stand no matter what else happens. Selfishness rears it's ugly headand many times in later years of marriage, after the children are gone, the husband and wife wonder whythey do not feel close. Nature slows them down andthey find no happiness in anything but their work.

It is sad enough to see this situation in the world, but brethren, how sad a day it is in Israel when theseconditions rear their heads among Christians. Often times these conditions are found among elders andteachers. Wives who should be happy to serve Godact as if they have to complete with their spouse. Certainly there is nothing wrong with the wife working away from the home as such (Ruth was avery frugal businesswoman) but when this working isthe driving force behind living, it is high time for herto get down on her knees to the God that made herand ask forgiveness for her selfishness and for forgetting her priorities. Women should not feel liketheir life is unfulfilled because they vacuum the house or wash the dishes or change diapers. If they could onlyrealize how truly admired a women of this type is bymen there would be many more good mothers andwives. To me, a woman who puts God and her familyfirst and herself last is the most beautiful creation in God's universe. A happy, contented, Christian woman;where is she these days?

Lest anyone get the wrong idea I am not saying awoman should be like the dolls you see on the dashboards. You push their head down and theygo every which way. A woman should be humbleand meek. Many seem to think meekness means weakness when the opposite is true. Meekness isstrength under control.

I used to hear my great-grandmother mention a song she knew about the hand that rocks the cradle rules the world. By the looks of the world it looks as if no one isdoing any rocking. Why not slow down and enjoy life?Where are you going? (Read Proverbs 31:10-31).

A FAR BETTER WAY

If it were possible for churches everywhere to restore to faithfulness all those in their area who are presently out of duty, new and larger church buildings would have to be built in almost every townand city. There are literally hundreds of people whoonce confessed the precious name of Jesus and werebaptized for the remission of their sins who have notremained faithful to their commitment, and after aperiod of vacillation and uncertainty, have wanderedback into the world.

The possibility of achieving a restoration of these erring members is far more possible than merely idealistic, and as such is deserving of our careful attention. But it occurs to me that the more effective means of retaining converts is the real thing needed.I do not argue that we should not seek to restore theunfaithful, for such is not only the assignment of thechurch, but the individual as well (Gal. 6:1). However,it seems that if some way could be devised whereby wecould keep those who have been converted, it wouldrender the necessity of restoration far less a problem.

I do not propose to be holden of such a sublimesolution. However, I do wish to suggest that mostderelicts follow a similar path in their route towardtotal departure. And while these simple things will not, admittedly, solve the aforementioned difficulty,they most certainly will contribute considerably tothe retardation of the mass exodus of new converts.

I am convinced that many newly convertedChristians fail to remain faithful from an absence of purpose. Once we have taught someone the truth, wewatch through tear-filled eyes as he is baptized intoChrist. Following such action, we proudly sigh withthe relief of accomplishment and view him as he stands there—a new convert! And there he stands. And stands. And stands. And therein lies at least a large part of the difficulty. Whether or not this new babe grows is left to chance. His future education inspiritual things is aimless, random, or at best undesigned. Brethren, new converts need purpose! Wewould not dare leave a new-born baby to fend forhimself, realizing full well that he would soon die.How then can we except the newly arrived spiritualbabe to survive in the absence of some provision forhis sustenance? Spiritual values are not absorbed by some ethereal process of osmosis; they must be distributed, assimilated, and then used. Such requiresintense teaching, regular stimulation toward action and, most vitally, a good example to show that suchbehavior is greatly to be desired from a practicalpoint of view.

The absence of purpose naturally results in an absence of pursuit. A course to follow is absolutelynecessary in any field of endeavor. Not only should such instruction include the clear, concise and understandable route to be followed, but it should also include a mentally perceptible goal which will necessarily add fuel to the motive to pursue alongcertain prescribed lines. The Bible is most effectivelyused when it is tenderly, but candidly carrying somespiritual adolescent along toward spiritual maturity.Its course, although strait and law-restricted, is welldefined and easily discernible. Its glorious promisesare so brilliantly displayed that they make the bosomswell with the expectancy and desire of hope. Thenewly found freedom in Christ and the continual voluntary submission to his will is held out in Scripture as that which will produce a tranquility and quietude described as a peace which is beyond comprehension (Phil. 4:7). Such realization by a newconvert will greatly reduce any neutrality or evasion and render his return to the world far less likely.

I am convinced that many converts stray back intothe world because of our failure to administer loving rebuke. If teaching is not intended to change lives,and if rebuking errant ways is not part of teaching,then I fail to see any value in it! We sometimesstubbornly refuse to see that a large part of teachingor preaching is involved directly with stern rebukeand strong, careful reproval. I freely grant that chastisement in teaching should spring from propermotive, but I also call to your attention the fact thattrue love is not averse to chastisement and, in fact, isnot true love at all if it is devoid of it (Heb. 12:6-11).Loving exhortation, meekly imploring chastisement,tenderly applied, shows we care and I believe manylost sheep are wandering aimlessly in the world of sin because inattentive shepherds failed to show true loveby keeping them sternly in the way. They left simplybecause they thought nobody cared!

A large number have left the faith because theythought it would be easy. We need to make it emphatically clear to newly born citizens of the kingdom that "all who live godly in Christ Jesus shallsuffer persecution" (II Tim. 3:12). If we can teachthem that Peter and the other apostles left a beatingwith backs punctuated with bloody stripes "rejoicingthat they were counted worthy to suffer shame for his name" (Acts 5:41), then they will likely cometo expect sufferings as not only a common, butnecessary part of Christianity. Only as they come torealize that Christ "was tempted in all points like aswe" (Heb. 4:15), will they be motivated to overcome.And only as they are taught that God will "provide away of escape that ye may be able to stand" (I Cor.10:12), will they see that temptation is bound to comeand that they must learn to seek deliverance from itthrough the Word of God. As surely as we teach themthat Christ was made perfect by overcoming (Heb. 5:89), they will be impressed with the necessity offollowing such a noble example. We need to show the new convert that living for Christ is not easy, but thatthe promises to be received by the faithful are so muchgreater than any inconvenience or suffering we mustbear that they are not worthy of any comparison. Onlythen will they have the necessary determination to remain faithful.

Finally, we cannot pamper and shelter the newconvert and expect him to become strong. He needsto be subjected to the elements if he is to build upany immunity to sin and disease. If there is troublein the church, he needs to know about it! He needs toknow because he needs to understand that we can no more tolerate error inside the Lord's body than wecan otherwise. He needs to be shown that immoralityand shameful conduct requires discipline, that failureto respond to loving and repeated calls to repentanceis reason for withdrawal, and that true dedication tobiblical instruction sometimes requires that our "dirty laundry" be hung out for all the world to see.And he needs to see clearly that although there maybe strength in numbers, the man who stands withGod is in the majority, no matter how many standotherwise. No person seeking to go to heaven shouldbe left at the baptistery, believing that he has enteredinto a germ-free society where nothing can get at himand where all with whom he has contact are devoid of any imperfections. Such an occurrence will surelyhasten his return to what he considers the "real" world with "real" people. But when he is shown thatthe church is people and that at times people willstumble and fall, but that they must get up againand keep trying, then he likely will be constrained toemulate such courage and determination.

Ladies and gentlemen, nobody has ever been rewarded for having started the race, but for having lawfully completed it (II Tim. 4:6-8)!

BE NOT DECEIVED

We are warned in the Scriptures against being deceived. Paul wrote the Corinthians and the Galatians, "Be not deceived" (I Cor. 6:9; 15:33; Gal.6:7). John and Paul wrote, "Let no man deceive you. . . ." (I Jn. 3:7; 2 Thess. 2:3). Hence, these passages, as well as others, tell us we need to bealert, lest we be deluded and misled.

There are many ways by which man can be deceived. Let us notice briefly several of them.

Thinking God Can Be Mocked

Some are deceived by thinking God can be mocked.Paul writes, "Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap"(Gal. 6:7). No one can fool or outwit God. Men mayfool themselves, but they cannot fool God. All willreap what they sow when God brings in the harvest.

Those who think they can walk after the flesh (participate in worldly and sinful practices) and stillgo to heaven are deceiving themselves. God will notallow such profligates to enter heaven. God's spirituallaw is just as inflexible as his physical law. We reapwhat we sow, whether spiritually or physically.

Paul plainly states, ". . .Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God" (I Cor. 6:9-10). We cannot live in adultery or homosexuality or drunkenness, etc., and go to heaven. Sowing to theflesh will produce corruption (Gal. 6.8).

Deceived By Sin

Sin is deceiving multitudes. The inspired writer stated, "But exhort one another daily, while it iscalled To day; lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin" (Heb. 3:13). Sin offers happiness, but gives misery. It promises success but produces failure. Heartaches, disappointments,disease, wars, death, and eternal damnation are the results of sin. Yet, in spite of its tragic and devastating effects, mankind tolerates and condonessin.

The reason for man's approval of sin is because ofits deceptive nature. It does not come clothed in ragsof suffering and shame, but rather adorned in satin ofpleasure and honor. But sin is a "snake in the grass," a "wolf in sheep's clothing." Beware of sin!

Deceived By Riches

In the parable of the sower, Jesus said the thorny-ground hearer becomes unfruitful because the word ischoked out by the care of this world and the deceitfulness of riches (Matt. 13:22). Riches are deceitful and many who have striven after them havepierced themselves through with many sorrows (ITim. 6:10).

Money and material possessions give many peoplea sense of security. They think if they have a largebank account and possess a good home with all of itsluxuries, they are set for life.

But there could be a depression and the rich couldbecome paupers overnight. Sickness could wipe out one's life savings. The government could collapse orbe overthrown and our money would be worthless.

Furthermore, money cannot buy life. The rich willdie as well as the poor. The parable of the rich farmer(Lk. 12:16-21) shows this. His wealth did not enablehim to buy a lease on life. God said, "Thou fool, thisnight thy soul shall be required of thee" (v. 20).

Jesus said, " ... for a man's life consisteth not in the abundance of the things which he possesseth"(Lk. 12:15). There are more important things in life than money. Good health is one. Happiness is another. Salvation of the soul is another. Let's not be deceived into thinking that material things are thesummun bonum of life.

Deceived By Hearing Only

James wrote, "But be ye doers of the word, andnot hearers only, deceiving your own selves" (Jas.1:22). Some think that if they just attend the servicesand attentively hear the word preached, they havefulfilled their responsibility. They are deluded! The word must be obeyed.

Brethren will listen to sermons on withdrawingfellowship from the unfaithful, but do nothing aboutit. Others will listen to a sermon on soul-saving and then never do anything about trying to save someone. Some will listen to a lesson on what the Bible teaches on modest apparel and shamefastness,but do nothing about their scanty attire. Such brethren are deceiving themselves into thinking theycan serve God while failing to obey Him.

Jesus said, "Therefore whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them, I will liken him unto a wise man. . . ." (Matt. 7:24). Those who hearand do not are likened unto a foolish man (7:26).James tells us that to hear and do not is like beholding our face in a natural glass and then goaway and forget what we looked like (Jas. 1:23-24).

Deceived By False Doctrines

False teachers, by good words and fair speeches,deceive the hearts of the simple or unsuspecting(Rom. 16:17-18). Paul said to mark or watch them closely and avoid them. To the Ephesians, Pauldeclared, "Let no man deceive you with vain words"(Eph. 5:6).

Satan uses every form of trickery and craftiness todelude our minds and capture our souls. Paul says,"And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light" (2 Cor. 11:14). He comes to usin a pious, sanctimonious manner. His preachers call themselves "preachers of righteousness" (2 Cor.11:15). They appear humble, loving and consecrated to the Lord. But they are pretentious, and "with feigned words make merchandise of you" (2 Pet. 2:3).They speak lies in hypocrisy, having their conscienceseared with a hot iron (I Tim. 4:2).

To prevent deception, we should search the Scriptures to see if the things are so (Acts 17:11).John says, "Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because manyfalse prophets are gone out into the world" (I Jn.4:1). Let's be cautious about what doctrine we hear.

Deceived By Our Lives

Some of us may think we are better than we are.There are those who think they have no sin. They aredeceived. John wrote, "If we say that we have nosin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us"(I Jn. 1:8). No man lives above sin. The best of us isgoing to sin. When we do sin, however, we have anadvocate with the Father, Jesus the Christ (1 Jn.2:1).

Too, Paul wrote, "For if a man think himself to besomething, when he is nothing, he deceiveth himself(Gal. 6:3). The person who believes he is so strongthat he does not have to be concerned about being overcome of sin, is deceived. Paul is attacking overconfidence, such as Peter manifested in saying

that he would never deny Jesus (Matt. 26:33-35).This type of person does not even think he needs thehelp of other brethren to help bear his burdens. Hecan bear his own burdens, he thinks. Paul says he deceiveth himself.

In conclusion, we quote the words of Jesus to hisdisciples when he spoke to them about the destruction of Jerusalem: "Take heed that ye be notdeceived" (Lk. 21:8). This advice is just as timelytoday.

SALVATION BY GRACE THROUGH FAITH (NO. 3)

In our last article, we pointed out that salvation isthe gift of God, and that it was provided by God'sgrace in the giving of His Son, Jesus Christ. In this article we want to discuss:

Law and Faith

In Romans chapter one, Paul shows how man is tobe saved. He is very emphatic about the gospel being God's power to save. He says in verse 17 that the righteousness of God is revealed "from faith unto faith." This righteousness, Paul says, is revealed inthe gospel, verse 16. The word "faith" in verse 17 isused in two different senses. It is from "faith" (thesystem of teaching) unto (in order to) faith (belief onthe part of man). The first word "faith" is used in the same sense in Jude verse 3. Thus the word "righteousness" used in verse 17 is the same as thatused in Rom. 10:1-2, where the words "righteousnessof God" means that which is to be obeyed as wenoted in our definitions of words in 1 John 3:17 in our first article.

One of the problems that many are having inunderstanding how one is to be saved by grace and atthe same time by obeying the perfect law of liberty (which James says we are to be doers of—and by which law we are to be judged, James 1:25; 2:12) is alack of understanding of Paul's teaching concerninglaw keeping in the first five chapters of the book ofRomans.

Keeping Law Without Violation

If we understand this point, we are well on our wayto understanding how we are required to keep theinstructions given in the perfect law of liberty; (andcannot be saved without so doing), and at the sametime understand that we are saved by grace. When Paul speaks concerning not being saved by works of law; he is referring to keeping any law perfectly—notoffending in one point. If you miss this point, you have missed the entire point of his teaching. If a man did that, Paul said, then the reward would not be ofgrace but of debt (Rom. 4:4). God would owe it tothat one who so kept the law, any law set forth byGod. This same principle is true with Eph. 2:8-9; Titus 3:5, and every other passage of scripture thatspeaks of works—even regarding the perfect law ofliberty. No man, saving Christ, has ever kept anylaw to perfection, for Paul said all have sinned and come short of the glory of God. (Rom. 3:23). Hence, no man can claim salvation by his meritorious workings. For, after one sins one time, he must depend on the blood of Christ (which is God's onlycleansing agent) to cleanse him of this sin, and thatmeans salvation by grace.

But What About Our Obedience?

If brethren could understand that God's grace is seen in every command given, then they could understand how Paul could say that Abraham's faith was counted unto him for righteousness (Rom.4:20-22). And we are told to walk in the steps offaith of our father Abraham (Rom. 4:12). Thus, if we have the kind of faith that Abraham had—that is believing on God who raised Jesus our Lord from thedead, we too shall be justified by faith (Rom. 4:24;5:1).

The word "faith" or belief here includes, of course, doing all that God's grace (every command given)requires. For when we examine Acts 16:31-34, we seethat those who were told to believe were instructed as to what to do. When they had repented and werebaptized, the text says they brought Paul and Silasback into their house and sat meat before them "having believed."

But What About Paul and James?

Someone may be heard to say, "doesn't James contradict Paul in James chapter two when he saysthat Abraham was justified by works" (James 2:21)?No! Notice the arguments that are being made byPaul and James.

In Romans chapters four and five, Paul is stating that works without faith will not save—for no man keeps any law perfectly, and that is the only way a man could be saved by works.

In James chapter two, James is stating that faithalone without works of obedience will not save. However, when we work works of righteousness(God's commands, Psalms 119:104; Acts 10:34) weare still saved by grace through faith, for God's grace provided the commands. Thus, we are saved by"faith which works by love" (Gal. 5:6).

We ask our readers to recall from previous study that a steward is one who has been entrusted with something of his master's to use for his master's wellbeing. There will be a time of accounting, so werecognize that "it is required of stewards that one befound trustworthy" (I Cor. 4:2).

In some way we all have been blessed by God withmaterial prosperity. Some have more than others, butwe all have some. We might suggest that this would include much more than our "take-home" pay. We have received many fringe benefits, freedoms offeredby this nation which we help support with our taxes,good homes, and many luxuries about which others inthe world know little. We must return a portion of this prosperity to God to do the work He has established the church to do. I Cor. 16:2 says, "Upon the first day of the week let every one of you lay byhim in store, as God has prospered him, that there beno gatherings when I come."In 2 Cor. 8 and 9 Paul has a great deal to say about giving. Though this situation was one of benevolence for the needy saints, his principles willhave general application. We will notice these thingsto help us be better stewards of our monies.

The Example (8:1-5)

Paul begins this section of 2 Corinthians bymaking an appeal to the generosity of the Macedonian churches (v. 2). He mentions their "greatordeal of affliction' and "deep poverty," yet they still gave in an "abundance of joy" and showed the"wealth of their liberality." Now these Christians could have reasoned, "We are suffering enough.""How can we give?" "Let the rich and big churchesgive!" Someone among them might have suggestedthat they ought to store their funds up for even worse times. No, their giving was with LIBERALITY. This word is defined as "simplicity, singleness, generosity, i.e. without self-seeking,openness of heart manifesting itself by benefactions."Their hearts were not cluttered up with self-seeking motives; they had one single purpose. Their attitudeof liberality resulted in an abundant giving.

The Macedonians also gave beyond their power (v.3). Paul had not even expected so large an offering.They were in no danger of giving too little, butconsidering their own poverty they may have been indanger of giving too much. Most Christians (?) todayseem to want to know how little they can give ratherthan giving beyond their ability.

The giving of the Macedonian Christians was voluntary. It was on their own accord (v. 3). They even seemed to beg Paul into allowing them to participate in this good work (v. 4). In many placestoday the begging is being done by the preacher orelders to the members in trying to get them to give.Such "pressured-giving" does not benefit the donor.Our giving must be from the heart; yea, we must DESIRE to give.

Why were the Macedonians so generous in theirgiving? Paul gives us the answer in verse five. Theyhad given themselves first to the Lord. This is indeedthe root of the problem. Too many do not want to surrender "self." The family, house, cars, jobs,recreation, and sometimes even the dogs and cats, allcome before God. "But seek first His kingdom andHis righteousness; and all these things shall be addedunto you" (Mt. 6:33).

The Exhortation (8:6-15)

Paul now begins to exhort the Corinthians regarding their own contribution. He encourages them to imitate the worthy example of the Macedonians (v. 6). We all ought to take a look atourselves and see how well our giving matches up tothe points made above. Is our giving characterized bygenerosity, liberality, and going beyond our ability?

The Corinthians were told to abound in this grace

(v. 7). They were abounding in faith, utterance, knowledge, earnestness, and love. But we must abound in every area of the work of the Lord (1 Cor.15:58). The word abound means "to be present inabundance, overflow; to be over and above a certain number or measure." The Jew had a certain number (tithe-10%) to give; the Christian is not under suchbondage. He is free to go above any set limit. He isfree to see just how much he can give! But how manythink they can give less than the Jew? Someone tellsthe following story which ought to illustrate thispoint. "A Jew and a Christian were in business together. They agreed to attend each other's church services. The Christian sat with the Jew and heard the 'Rabbi.' The plate was passed, and the Jew,loving his religion, gave $30 (a tenth of his week'searnings). Come Sunday, the Jew sat with the Christian during the service. The plate was passed. Although they had earned the same wage, the Christian (?) gave his usual $10. The Jew whispered to him, 'Almost thou persuadest me to be a Christian.' " Let us remember the poor widow whogave 100% (Mk. 12:42-44)!

The Corinthians were to practice the love of Christ(vs. 8-9). To feel that we are forced to give profits usnothing. "And if I give all my possessions to feed thepoor, and If I deliver my body to be burned, but donot have love, it profits me nothing." (1 Cor. 13:3).Our giving must be motivated by our love for thespread of the gospel and the benefit of the needysaints. Paul appeals to the example of the great loveof Christ who gave up the "riches" of heaven to become poor for our benefit.

Paul next exhorts the Corinthians to complete theirgood work according to their ability (vs. 10-12). It isnot enough to desire to do good or plan to do it"some day." Faith without works is dead (Jas. 2:1426). Our giving is to be according to our ability, notsomeone else's. We might be able to give more than someone else. It is funny how man's prosperitybegins to dwindle around April 15 (income-tax-time)and around the first day of the week (laying-by-instore-time) .The final point in this section is for the Corinthians togive in order to relieve the burdens of others (vs. 1315). This exhortation is based on the principle of equality. He quotes from Ex. 16:18 in regard to Israelites having an equality of manna. Thoughsome, due to age or physical strength, might gathermore than others, they all were to have their portion.Those who tried to "horde" it up, found themselvesin need of an air freshener. Paul is not saying thateveryone should have equal amounts of dollars and cents. The point is that no Christian should be in distress while another Christian has an abundance.

The Messengers (8:16-9:5)

These messengers had been selected by the churches to handle the collected funds (8:16-24). The purpose in having these messengers was "that no oneshould discredit us in our administration of this generous gift." It is always wise to have more thanone person handling large donations. What is the old saying about "safety in numbers?" It is sad even tosee in some churches that no financial statement or report is made of any kind to the congregation. Beware!

In this section Paul also appeals to the pride of theChristians at Corinth (9:1-5). He said it was not necessary for him to write in this regard, suggestingthat they knew what they must do. Paul had boastedof the Corinthians to those in Macedonia. It would certainly be embarrassing to him and to the Corinthians as well if they failed to carry out their purpose. Some of us ought to be embarrassed whenwe post the amount of the contribution for all to see.

The Encouragement (9:6-15)

Paul now begins to speak of the motives for giving.He speaks first of all about the law of nature, the lawof reaping and sowing (v. 6). If we give bountifullywe shall receive bountifully, if we sow sparingly weshall also reap sparingly. Our giving should not be grudgingly. Some give their money to the Lord likethey give their teeth to the dentist. Neither shouldour giving be of necessity, that is, we should not feellike we are forced to give. Rather our giving must bedone cheerfully. God loves a cheerful giver (v. 7). Do wewant to please God?

Paul finally ends this section of the book bywriting about the results of bountiful giving (vs. 815). When we give bountifully God will increase ourresources (vs. 8-11). When we give bountifully theneeds of the needy saints will be met (v. 12). Whenwe give bountifully prayers are going to be offered toGod. Thanksgiving will be made to God (vs. 12-13).They will be intercessions made on behalf of the givers

(v. 14). Surely this would be a great blessing for "theeffectual fervent prayer of a righteous man availeth much." (Jas. 5:16).

Conclusion

Let us remember these things when it comes time

for us to purpose in our hearts how much we aregoing to give to the Lord (9:7). Remember that as stewards we will have to give an accounting untoGod.

SATANISM

C. S. Lewis once said, "Man makes one of twomistakes with Satan; he either denies his existence orhas an inordinate interest in him." On Nov. 15, 1972,Pope Paul VI gave an address on Satan that embarrassed many Catholic scholars. One Catholicscholar said, "No up to date theologian believesSatan is a person" (New York Times Magazine, Feb. 4, 1973, page 15). Joseph Komenchak, Professor ofDogmatic Theology at St. Joseph Catholic Seminaryin New York said, "For most theologians a personaldevil is something of an embarrassment" (Newsweek Magazine, Aug. 16, 1971).

We need to be impressed with the fact that Satanis real. Peter said so (1 Peter 5:8). Satan talked to Adam and Eve in the garden (Gen. 3:1-19). He bothtalked with God (Job 1:6-12; 2:1-5) and appeared toJob (Job 2:7). Satan tempted Christ (Mt. 4:1-11). Satan is a real person.

Rise of Satanism

In a movie several years ago a woman gave birth to the baby of Satan. This movie, "Rosemary'sBaby," I consider a slap at the virgin birth.

Then in 1966, the "Church of Satan" was foundedin San Francisco by Anton Szandor LaVey. With10,000 members in 1971, it grew to 2 million in 1975.LaVey copyrighted The Satanic Bible in 1969, which says, on page 46, "The seven deadly sins of the Christian Church are: greed, pride, envy, anger, gluttony, lust and sloth. Satanism advocates indulging in each of these 'sins' as they all lead tophysical, mental and emotional gratification" and onpage 33, he says "hate your enemies with the wholeheart, and if a man smite you on one cheek, SMASHhim on the other!; smite him hip and thigh, for self-preservation is the highest law." When LaVey started his 'church' he and his disciples staged a'black wedding' with a nude woman on the altar.

Concern over Satanism

Law enforcement authorities in this country havebeen concerned over Satanism and the practice ofsuch. Two men in California and Montana were charged with murder and are reported to have admitted killing their victims and dismembering theirbodies as a part of a Satanic ritual. In LivingstonCounty, Michigan, a 17 year old girl was torturedand killed and those charged with her murder claimedto be "Satan's Satanic Servants." In Los Angeles,police investigated the murder of a school teacher.The missing heart, lungs, and other body parts of thedead teacher were thought to have been used in abloody sacrifice to the Devil. Charles Manson oftenclaims to be Satan and the Sharon Tate murders have connections with Satanism. 'Squeaky' From, you remember, was associated with Manson, and made anattempt on President Ford's life.

Origin of Satan

"Where did Satan come from?" is a question oftenasked. Some have suggested he was (1) created byGod, (2) always existed or (3) he is a fallen angel.Some passages have been used to prove he has beenkicked out of heaven.

(1) Isa. 14:12 — "How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning!" and with these words many suppose Lucifer if Satan. However, a closer look at Isa. 14 shows Lucifer" is the "king of Babylon" against whom the proverb was taken up. The text says "king ofBabylon" not Satan. (2) Ezek. 28:1-19 — "thou was perfect" . . . ."I will cast thee to the ground" refers not to Satan but to the "prince" (verse 2) and "king of Tyrus" (verse 12). (3) Lk. 10:18 — "I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven" does not say he fell from heavenbut Jesus was using a simile to show how Satan is limited or bound. (4) Rev. 12:7-9 — This passage says the Devil "was cast out into the earth." A study of thebook of Revelation will show this was in vision to John and not the Devil being cast out of heaven intothe literal earth.

While I have read several articles on the origin ofSatan, none so far to my satisfaction gives a specificanswer. With this I may expose my ignorance, but Ihad rather do that on this point than teach error. I feel it may be one of those things known to God (Dt.29:29) and that we would do ourselves a servicetrying to avoid Satan rather than spending a lot oftime seeking to learn his origin.

Titles of Satan

The New Testament gives several titles by whichSatan is called. He is called "the devil" (Mt. 4:1); "the tempter" (Mt. 4:3) and "Satan" (Mt. 4:10). Then he is called "Belial" (2 Cor. 6:15). He is called 'Beelzebub" (Mt. 12:24-30). In Revelation he is called the "dragon" (Rev. 12:3, 9, 13, 17).

Satan Described

The way the New Testament describes Satan givesone a good picture as to his nature. Peter speaks ofhim as "a roaring lion" and "your adversary" (1 Peter 5:8). Jesus called him the "prince of this world" (John 12:31), and "a liar" (John 8:44). Paul calls him "the god of this world" (2 Cor. 4:4); "anangel of light" (2 Cor. 11:14) and "the prince of thepower of the air" (Eph. 2:2).

Is Satan Active Today?

Some might wonder if Satan is active today? No,not personally. You will not meet him on the street. The New Testament pictures Satan as beingrestricted or limited in power. Jesus said he was ableto bind the strong man, which is Satan (Mt. 12:2229). Jesus said he beheld "Satan as lightning fall from heaven" (Lk. 10:18). Again, Jesus said Satan was "cast out" (John 12:31). Paul said Jesus "spoiled principalities and powers" (Col. 2:15). One of the things Jesus did was to "destroy . . . the devil" (Heb. 2:14), and "destroy the works of the devil" (1 John 3:8). The Devil is pictured as being cast out" (Rev. 12:7-13). If language means anything, these verses all suggest that Satan is restricted and bound.

However, while one is bound he can work throughhis agents or messengers. For example, while Jimmy Hoffa was in prison, he still carried on through hisagents, and with the agents of Satan doing such agood job today, he really doesn't need to be loose. Satan is changed into "an angel of light" and his ministers are transformed as the ministers of righteousness" (2 Cor. 11:14-15). And one of the things these ministers do is use deception. One's coming is described as "after the working of Satanwith all power and signs and lying wonders" (2 Th.2:9-10). Satan is described as taking the word of Godout of the heart, of those who hear the word and not giving it a place in their heart. "Satan" is said to do this in Mk. 4:15, but in Mt. 13:19 "the wicked one" is said to do this. All false teachers are the agentsthrough whom Satan works today.

Paul said the devil had a 'snare' (1 Tim. 3:7). His snare may be at times good words and fair speeches(Rom. 16:17-18), the flesh (2 Peter 2:18) or his subtlety (2 Cor. 11:3).

While Satan is out seeking whom he may devour (1Peter 5:8), we need to remember to "resist the devil,and he will flee from you" (Jas. 4:7).

A DANDY DEFINITION

The dictionary describes a "dandy" as a person"who gives undue attention to dress." Daniel Sommer told about a "little preacher" in earlier dayswho had a slightly different definition of the word,but one we can appreciate today, in view of somecharacters we see cavorting around here and there.The preacher's name was Michael Gorman.

Sommer participated in a debate with Robert Miller, a Dunkard or German Baptist, at some placein Ohio near the end of the last century. Among those who attended was a Dunkard preacher from McPherson, Kansas, who "parted his hair in the middle" and "was girlish or dandyish in appearance."Gorman, though small in stature, was opposite in appearance. One day the two met between sessionsand the Dunkard from the Sunflower State said to Gorman, "I don't wish to hurt your feelings, but Ihave called you a Campbellite feist."

"And I don't wish to hurt your feelings," Gorman replied, "but I have said you are the German BaptistDandy. And as you may not know what a dandy is, Iwill tell you. A dandy is one who would be a womanif he could! But since he can't, he does all he can toshow people that he is not a man." (William Wallace, Daniel Sommer, a Biography, pp. 165-166).

Noah Webster couldn't top that.

EDWARD L. ROBERTS, Parkview Apts. 36, Powhatan Point, Ohio 43942 • We are leaving the work at Powhatan Point the last ofSeptember for Brunswick, Ohio. We have had two good years ofwork here. In this time we have had 13 baptisms and 12 restored.The congregation in Brunswick, Ohio has an average attendance ofabout 16 members in a town of 15,000. All of my support will have tocome from the outside. At this time I have partial support to go up on but will need more to be able to work full-time with them. If there is a congregation that could help in the work at Brunswick, please writeme at my present address before September 30, 1977 or write the brethren at Brunswick. Their address is: Church of Christ, 317 PearlRoad, Brunswick, Ohio 44212.

J. MARKLEE RAULERSON, 170 Wilson Hts., Kalispell,Montana 59901 — Those who will be traveling in the Great Northwestand particularly Montana should be interested to know that thereare two new churches (bringing the total to three) in the state ofMontana. In addition to the church in Poison, MT there is now achurch meeting at 1229 7th St., W. in Kalispell, MT. This is thechurch which met temporarily in Whitefish, MT.).

Contacts are: George Watkins (755-2625) or J. M. Raulerson (755-9779).There is also a new congregation in Evaro, MT (15 miles north of Missoula). Contact: Leroy Bowman (726-3647). Also, in Fernie, British Columbia, Canada there are some saints meeting in the home of LeslieHess (423-7262). At this time there is not a gospel preacher who can devote full-time to traveling and preaching in Montana. DonPartain and myself are "making tents" and preaching as opportunity affords. If any reader knows of any other faithful saints or anyone who may be approachable with the truth please write me at the aboveaddress or call (406-755-9779).

ATTENTION BULLETIN EDITORS EDMUND LOPES is a prisoner converted by Dennis Lynd. The stateof Illinois tried to delay his baptism but that effort failed through pressure brought on by the news media. He is reported to be a man ofgreat faith and much ability and there is some hope that he maypreach the gospel once he is released. You might do much good byadding his name to your bulletin mailing list. His address is: Edmund Lopes, Box 99, Pontiac, Illinois 61764.

Page 15

GENE TAYLOR, Box 4013 Sta. A., Evansville, IN 47711 — I have been working with the Northwest church in Evansville sincethe first of June. Since that time we have had two baptisms andone restored. The church here is under the leadership of three fineelders and shows a willingness to work. We have just completed asix weeks men's training class and will have more classes onceschool starts in the fall. Besides my support, the church here ishelping support three other men: Aude McKee in Knoxville, TN;Doug Davidson in Richmond, VA and Rudolfo Berdini in Rome,Italy. We publish a weekly bulletin, THE TRUTH SEEKER,with about 650 on our mailing list. It is mailed to the communitysurrounding our building and to interested individuals across thestates. Our fall meeting will be with A. C. Grider, October 3-9.JIMMY TUTEN, 6710 Dorchester Rd., Apt. 200 H, CharlestonHeights, SC 29405 — We at Ashley Heights are moving well inspite of being hit hard during vacation periods this summer. Thebrethren are at peace and are enthusiastic. We just completed atraining class and already two of our young men have been out topreach in difficult places in SC. One of them had never preachedprior to the training class. Soon we plan to conduct a training class in cottage meeting procedure and hopefully can get several brethren into homes teaching the gospel. We believe if we can accomplish this we will see immediate growth. Recently one younglady was baptized; we have two restored and two confessed errors.If you know of any in the service stationed in Charleston who would be interested in attending a sound church, get in touch withme and we will contact them. The work here is difficult and slow. Pray for us, brethren. Be sure to visit with us when passing throughthis area. Our address is 2605 S. Oakridge Circle, CharlestonHeights, just off 1-26 and Ashley Phos. Road.JERRAL KAY, P.O. Box 834, Rapid City, South Dakota 57701—So far as we know this church here is the only sound church inthis state. We have 42 members with an attendance of about 50 usually. The church is a little over two years old. I am workingfull-time with the church which is known as the Box Elder congregation. Between February and June of this year we havehad 8 baptisms. Leon Odom conducted our first gospel meetingthis past May. We are one mile from the main gate of the Air Base. Coming east from Rapid City on I-90 take Exit 63 (BoxElder) or take Exit 66 and go south over the railroad tracks to Line Road. We meet on the corner of Line Road and Oak St. (Theeditor and his family enjoyed meeting with these brethren on Wednesday night in August while returning from a meeting atKaysville, Utah. The brethren have an attractive meeting placeand seem to be making good progress. It was our privilege toteach their adult class that night. If you have never visited withbrethren in such areas where congregations are so scare, it woulddo you good to do so. We met also with the church at Emerado,near Grand Forks, North Dakota where Gary Hargis is doing a good work. They have about 40 in attendance. Brethren, the greatnorthern plains of our land have been grossly neglected when itcomes to gospel work.)JAY K. Guyer, 57 Holly Lane, Holliston, Massachusetts 01746 —The church here no longer meets in our basement, rather in the basement of the Masonic Lodge in Hopkinton. Having a more permanent place has already helped in that some have recentlyvisited our assemblies. For midweek services we rotate havingstudy in our homes. We have made an offer on a building whichhas been accepted and look forward to having our own property.It is an old Baptist building on about a half acre in Sutton, MAwhich is south of Worcester and 20 minutes southwest of Hopkinton. In June we had a short, but edifying meeting withRobert E. Speer from Wisconsin. A few area residents came. The work here is a bit more encouraging in recent months. We have four Bible studies going on presently and other contacts to bepursued. While we have lost members who have moved out of state, these have been replaced by some who were converted whileout of the northeast but who have returned as permanentresidents. With two new families we have an attendance of 35, excluding visitors. In November Robert Speer and I plan a sixweek's trip to Nigeria where we expect to speak three times a day.

PREACHER NEEDED HARRISON, ARKANSAS — The Capps Road church is in needof a full-time man to work with us. Partial support will have tobe raised elsewhere. Please contact Bud Walsh, Rt. 8 Box 575, Harrison, AR 72601, (501-741-9182); or James Watts, LeonardAve., Harrison, AR, (501-741-9035).