The idea of a revelation of God's mind to man is repulsive to many, even some religious people. This is an attack upon the Bible. Many claim that theBible is not an accurate and dependable revelation for man in maters of faith, morals and a guide toeternal life. Because of this attitude many attempts have been made either to take from the Bible those things considered unimportant, or to add such things that are thought to be needed. If it is in truth and fact a revelation from God to man it most certainly is sufficient for all purposes.

Revelation is the uncovering or revealing of something unknown. Even nature itself is a revelation. The universe reveals some greater power than isknown upon the earth. "The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handiwork" (Ps. 19:1). Something may be known of theinvisible things of God by the things clearly seen: the things that are made (Rom. 1:19,20). No man can honestly observe the world in which he lives and deny a power and intelligence to bring it into existence. This declares that God is, but it does not tell us His will for man.

There are four terms used in the word of God that express the meaning of revelation. A few thoughts on these words perhaps will provoke further study of this subject.

1. Reveal. This is from the same root word as revelation, and it means "to uncover; reveal; makenaked." This tells us that something was covered and in the act of uncovering it was "revealed." In the case of the Bible it was the mind of God that was hidden or covered and the act of revealing it made it known to man. This is something God must do for man (I Cor. 2:10; Rom. 1:17. Rev. 1:1; Gal. 1:11,12).

God sees and knows all things, hence nothing is covered from Him (Heb. 4:13). He knows the past, present and future perfectly; it is all in His mind.With man many things are covered, and many things he can never uncover for himself. He is limited by time, space and ability. He knows nothing of thefuture by himself; it is covered to him. Since thefuture is uncovered to God, and man can not uncover it for himself, God must reveal it to him if he ever knows it.

Many things are covered from man because of his sinful nature. He does not often know what is good for him; it is covered from him. He does not know his way (Jere. 10:23). He does not know how to get out of his sins. He does not know how to get toheaven and avoid hell. He does not know his origin, purpose or destiny. But all these things are open and naked to the eyes and mind of God, and the only place man can get this information is to learn them from God. Only God can uncover His own mind. Hence,the process of "revealing" these things by the Spirit of God who knows the mind of God is the revelation that makes the Bible what it is. God "breathed out" His mind to man and it became uncovered or revealed to him (II Tim. 3:16,17).

2. Declare. The idea in declare is to "tell out" or "lead out." It suggests the "drawing out" or "exegeting" of something.

In John 1:18 we have this example of "drawing out": "No man hath seen God at anytime; the onlybegotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him." Christ is the one who brings out or unfolds what is hidden in the mind of God by "declaring" it. That is exactly what revelation is.

What needs to be "drawn out" is what is hidden or concealed. This is what is in the mind of God but not in the mind of man. By "declaring" it to man, it is "led out" of the mind of God into the mind of man. This which is declared is the truth regarding God.The eternal purposes and plans of God were hidden in His mind from the beginning of the world (Eph. 3:9), but now they are revealed in Christ who knows the mind of God.

1. Manifest. This word means "to bring out; bring to light or in the open; to make something known." To bring to light or to make it known implies that before the thing was in darkness or unknown. It was hidden in the mind of God and brought forth by the revelation through Christ (Rom. 1:19; Titus 1:3; I Cor. 4:5). When God makes known or "brings out" what is in His mind, He makes manifest those things which before were mysteries to man (Heb. 4:13).
2. Mystery. This word is often used in contrast to what is made manifest. The word speaks of the cover itself. T his is what is in God's mind that had not been brought out. Paul uses this word sometimes in referring to what was hidden before the revelation of the New Testament. A "mystery" is what is un

known, and to make it manifest is to make it known. There are no mysteries to God because all is known to Him. Therefore, the things that are mysteries are those things in the mind of God that have not beenmade known to God. They are mysteries to man, notGod. "How that by revelation he made known unto me the mystery . . ." (Eph. 3:3). This was done bythe Holy Spirit revealing the mind of God to man(I Cor. 2:10-13).

FIVE SUBSCRIPTIONS FOR $10.00

January 23-26, 1967 "The Living God And The Living Word"

Recorded on new 1 1/2 mil Mylar tape of good quality.This new weather resistant tape, recorded on both sides at 3 3/4 i.p.s. can be played on any recorder using a 7"reel.

ANY TWO LECTURES ON ONE TAPE

Make Your Choice

The Inspired Word...................................... . Jere Frost The Word— Mental And PhysicalHealth ____ ............... __ Dr. William McElwain God of Cr eation vs the "god" o

Materialism ......................... __ David Harkrider Modern Theology and God ................... . Hiram Hutto The Spiritual House and Spiritual Sacrifices .. Tom ButlerThe Living God in the Psalms ................ Homer HaileThe Living Word and Living Things _____ Melvin CurryThe Profitable Word (II Timothy 3) ....... Granville Tyler God of Revelation vs the "gods" of

Inspiration............................ ____ O. C. Birdwell Modern Theology and the Miraculous .... Paul Williams The Living Past .............................-.... James HodgesThe Coming God-King in the Psalms____ Homer Hailey The Word of His Power............................ CurtisE. Flatt God of Pr ovidence vs the "god" of

Indifference ___ .......... ____...... Hershel Patton Modern Theology an

Dispensationalism .....-..... -...... William Wallace Reminiscing With McGarvey ............... Henry S. Ficklin The Living God and Prayer ....................... Billy Murrel!The Final Word ............... ____.......... Robert Jackson The Living Word on the Living Frontier

(Three lectures on one tape) . ___ ..... Sewell Hall

Each Tape (two speeches) — $3.00 Entire Program (10 tapes) — $27.00 Order from: PHILLIPS PUBLICATIONS

P. O. Box 1 7244Tampa, Florida 33612

SOME LETTERS TO THE EDITORS

The gospel of Christ has always provoked response of some kind from those who hear it. Sometimes the response is complete obedience; sometimes it is violent rejection. In between these two opposite reactions is that indifferent, unconcerned and pa ive attitude. Jesus said: "Woe unto you, when all menshall speak well of you! for so did their fathers to the false prophets" (Luke 6:26). Anyone whopreaches and practices the truth of the New Testament can expect strong opposition from some. T his is not to say that opposition is a guarantee that one is standing for the truth, for truth itself stands opposed to error. The general idea today that theright kind of preaching is accompanied by almost universal acceptance is simply not so. The persecution of Christ, the apostles and Christians in all parts of the world in New Testament times shows what follows the preaching of the word of Chr ist.

I am glad to receive letters of disagreement fromreaders because it causes me to study to make sure of the truth and it gives me an opportunity to deal specifically with matters of misunderstanding. know one thing for sure from such letters: someone is reading the paper and getting the point

I have several letters from readers who did not ask that their names be withheld, who either gavtheir judgment of the paper and its contents or asked questions to be answered. Two of these letters are reproduced here which will serve a purpose in this article which I shall point out as I go along. Godknows my heart that I have no ill will whatever toward any person who writes or differs with me.Anyone whose letter appears here may have the

space to say what he wants to say in reply to anything I shall say. Following are the letters and mycomments respect them.

May 22, 1967Gentlemen:

am returning your issues of "Searching The Scriptures" and you can cancel the balance of this subscription and refund the money to whoever submitted my name to you. I do not believe the way that you people do and therefore do not want this type of religious paper in my home. Your thoughts and editorials will never change my views on the true Church of Christ.

Respectfully yours,

Randell Williams

Nashville, T enn.

Of course, I shall be happy to comply with therequest of this reader. His name shall be immediately taken from our files. If you are receiving Searching The Scriptures without having paid yourown subscription, someone thought enough of youto pay for your subscription, hoping that you would at least study the things said in the light of God's word. But when one writes that he does not want to read the paper, his name is taken off the mailinglist at his request.

The above letter is a perfect example of prejudice in the strongest form. Notice: "I do not believe the way you people do . . ." Does this mean that we are wrong and he is right? What if a Roman Catholicshould say the same to this person ? Would it follow that the Catholic is right and this man is wrong? Certainly not! What this person is really saying is: "I do not agree with you and I do not want to hear what you have to say because I do not want to hear anything that conflicts with my views."

This is further established by the next statement: "Your thoughts and editorials will never change my views on the true Church of Christ." He will never (emphasis his) change his views. When one closeshis ears to any evidence that does not agree with his views, there is not much anyone can do for him. I am made to wonder just what view such an onehas "on the true Church of Christ." If it is the same as taught in the New T estament, he has nothing tofear from investigation; If it is different, he must learn it before he goes into eternity. Jesus said some "seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand" (Matt. 13:13).

June 8, 1967 Dear Bro. Phillips:

Please forgive me for my ungratefulness in notwriting you a letter of thanks in your liberalities in sending me copies of your Searching The Scriptures.

In your issue of February, 1967 on page 3 the last paragraph of your Editorial allow me to quote yourstatement. "We ar e not afraid of contr oversy andwill meet err or wherever we find it. In the fear of God we intend to be no respecter of persons in this matter. We do not intend to compromise truth forany price. We want to do all the good we can andno harm at all. May God help us to be faithful toHis word, open minded to receive divine truth, unashamed and unafraid to boldly speak His word, andgive Him glory for all good done to the very end. So be it."

With this statement brother Phillips please help me search the truth by myself by answering myquestions viz:

1. Do you consider as error the Orphan Homesand the Herald of Truth Radio Sermon sponsored by the Highland church church (sic) of Christ being defended by brethren Guy N. Woods, G. K. Wallace and E. R. Harper?
2. If yes, are you willing to meet said brethren in a written debate in your paper "Searching The Scriptures" and in the Gospel Advocate also?
3. If said methods of Orphan Home caring andRadio Sermons Cooperation are wrong are you alsowilling to put in a written debate to be published both in your paper and in the Gospel Advocate paper of the brotherhood your negative propositions and affirmative propositions arrangement which are Scriptural to be denied by either the (sic) Wallace, Woods or Harper?

Yes brother Phillips kindly help me see, search, weigh or balance the truth by myself examinations by your printed or written debates to be published on both Searching The Scriptures and in the Gospel Advocate. May I repeat if you consider said Orphan Home Caring and Cooperation defended by brethren

G. K. Wallace, Guy N. Woods and E. R. Harper are unscriptural please answer me back sending your Affirmative Propositions and Negative Propositions on said Orphan and Cooperation issues with your suggestions of the length of time and pages the written debate be conducted and I shall as soon as I receive it forward immediately to brother Woodsfor his consideration also to help me weigh, examinetruth by your written debates, God willing.

Praying, hoping, thanking and waiting for your

soon reply, I remain Your brother in Christ, L aureano N. Belo Koronadal, Cotabato,Philippines

If I can judge from this letter, this brother is honest in heart and wants to find the truth from the word of God. I appreciate his letter very much andwill give a frank and direct answer to his questions.

Brother Belo, your quotation from our editorial of February, 1967 is correct, and to this we are dedicated because we believe it to be accor ding to thewill of God. If we learn otherwise, we will changeimmediately and will not be ashamed to admit it.Now to the questions.

1. Yes, I consider the Orphan Homes and theHerald of Truth Radio Program as "defended bybrethren Guy N. Woods, G. K. Wallace and E. R.Harper" error. Don't be confused by this answer tothink that I believe caring for orphans or preaching the gospel over the radio is wrong. The real issue is not the work being done; it is the unscriptural organizations through which the church tries to dothe work. I oppose these unscriptural organizations as centralized agents through which thousands of congregations cooperate on the same grounds andfor the same reason I oppose the Missionary Society through which churches try to preach the gospel tothe lost. I am not opposed to the preaching of the gospel, but I am opposed to the human systemthrough which it is done. The usual defense is to divert attention from the real issue to the work being done and charge that we are against the work. T his is not so, and by this time most brethren ought to know it.

1. Yes, I am willing to meet these brethren, oneor all three, in a written debate on this subject inboth Searching The Scriptures and the Gospel Advocate. Let me say kindly, do not hold your breath until the editor of the Gospel Advocate agrees to such an arrangement, even if these brethren wouldagree to such a written discussion. I seriously doubt that you could get your letter above in the Gospel Advocate with no other comment. I may be wrong, but you could prove it to yourself by trying.
2. Yes, I am perfectly willing to submit an affirmative of what I believe the Bible to teach, and I will also write what I will deny. However, I am almost certain that not one of the men you mention willdeny what I will affirm. I will be put in the same position in which they would be found if writing an affirmative proposition with a Christian Church preacher on instrumental music in worship. If theyaffirmed: "The scriptures teach that Christians are to sing in worship to God", the Christian Church preacher would not deny it. They would have toaffirm a negative: "T he scriptures do not authorize instrumental music in worship."

I will affirm any one of the following propositions regarding "Orphan Home caring and Radio Sermons Cooperation" —

"The scriptures teach that every Christian is to care for any orphan in need according to his opportunity and ability."

"The scriptures teach that churches of Christ are authorized to care for the needy saints and widowsindeed."

"The church built by Christ is fully capable of doing all that Christ authorizes it to do without anyhuman organization through which to do it."

'The scriptures teach that each congregation of God's people is completely independent and autonomous in all its work authorized by Christ."

"The scriptures teach that the rule of elders is limited to the flock which is among them."

"The scriptures teach that churches of Christ cooperate without any organic tie or central organization."

These are some of the affirmative propositions I submit, but I doubt that any of the men you mentionwould deny them. This, however, is exactly what I believe the scriptures to teach.

I will deny any one of the following propositions regarding this matter —

"The scriptures teach that churches of Christ maybuild and maintain benevolent organizations through which to care for orphans."

"The scriptures teach that churches of Christ have a benevolent responsibility to those of the world."

"The scriptures teach that churches of Christ maypool their financial resources in one eldership topreach the gospel to the lost."

"The Herald of Truth of Abilene, Texas is a scriptural arrangement through which churches of Christ may preach the gospel."

These are a few of the simplest propositions that deal with the real issue. Ambiguous and wordy propositions tend to cloud the real issue and provide afield for side and unrelated questions.

Any length articles and number of pages will besuitable to me. I have no hope whatever that such a discussion will come about. I have nearly as muchchance to stand in Red Square in Moscow and denounce Communism as to present my understanding of God's word on these subjects through the pagesof the Gospel Advocate.

Thank you for your good letter and may God bless you to lear n the truth that is found in the word of God. I shall be happy to help in any way.

QUESTION — Some use James 5:14-16 for proofthat divine healing continues today. Is the sickness referred to in these verses physical or spiritual? It seems that verse sixteen makes it spiritual. If so, are not those who use this to prove divine healingtoday guilty of perverting the word of God? — W.P. Answer — Before attempting an answer let us read carefully the text:

"Is any sick among you? let him call for the

elders of the church; and let them pray over

him, anointing him with oil in the name of the

Lord: And the prayer of faith shall save the

sick, and the Lord shall raise him up; and if he

have committed sins, they shall be forgiven

him. Confess your faults one to another, and

pray one for another, that ye may be healed.

The effectual fervent prayer of a righteous

man availeth much."

I believe that a twofold healing is referred toin these verses — one physical, the other spiritual. The prayer of the elders (v. 14) relates to physicalillness.

In the early church spiritual gifts were giventhrough the laying on of hands by the apostles (Acts 8:18; 19:6). One spiritual gift was that of healing (I Cor. 12:9). These gifts served tostrengthen and sustain churches in a day when theywere without the New Testament — by confirming the word (Mark 16:20; Heb. 2:2-4) and revealing truth on various issues (I Cor. 12:1-11). It is only natural to conclude that among those to whom theapostles imparted these gifts would be the elders in the various congregations. After all they are shepherds of the flock and bear a special responsibility toward all therein. The congregation is a"charge allotted" to them (I Pet. 5:1-5).

Now, looking at our text again we find that elders are to pray over the sick. James says, "the prayer of faith shall save the sick, and the Lord shall raise him up" (v. 15). What follows is significant! Notice, "and if he have committed sins, they shall be forgiven him." This is a spiritual healing (a forgiveness of sins), but it is in addition to the former healing. Notice again, "and if he have committedsins." It just might be that the one being prayed for by the elders is without guilt of sin at the time. If so, of course, he would not need to be healed of it. But there is no doubt about the other sickness — he needs this healing. Therefore, physical illness is under consideration in the passage. In verses fourteen and fifteen the prayer is primarily for physical healing. Secondarily, spiritual healing is under consideration in verses fifteen and sixteen.

Spiritual gifts, including the power of divine healing or miraculous power to heal, were peculiar to the miraculous age of the church. There is nothing in these verses or elsewhere to indicate a continuation of such power today. In fact, there is much to the contrary. Note further it was "the prayer of faith" that availed. Those who claim divine power to heal today account for their failures onthe grounds of a lack of faith on the part of the one for whom they pray. The text, however, does not say "the prayer for the faithful shall save the sick," but rather "the prayer of faith shall save the sick." The faith was on the part of the one praying, notthe one for whom the prayer was made.

'CLERICAL CELIBACY" AND GOD'S WORD!

The expression "clerical celibacy" simply means "abstinence from marriage in accordance with religious vows," according to the Britannica World Language Dictionary.

THE APOSTLE PETER WAS MARRIED

"And Simon's wife's mother was taken with a great fever..." Luke 4:38. Also Matt. 8:14 and Mark 1:30.

BISHOPS WERE MARRIED MEN

"A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife ..." I Tim. 3:2. See also Titus 1:6.

BISHOPS WERE TO HAVE CHILDREN AND HOUSEHOLDS

"One that ruleth well his own house, having his children in subjection with all gravity; (For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?)" (I Tim. 3:4-5,and T itus 1:6)

T her e is no question whatsoever but what the New Testament Christians were free to decide for themselves, whether to marry or to remain single.We have submitted the above quotations in order to prove that some of the apostles and the bishops (elders, overseers, pastors) were married men

However, since the Roman Catholic Church hasseen fit to legislate where God has not, concerningthis subject, we shall consider the Apostle Paul's writings on the matter. We should carefully consider his wr itings due to the fact that Catholicism(Roman, not Greek) attempts to use Paul as the basis for her laws against clerical marriage.

PAUL TO THE CORINTHIANS

"I suppose therefore that this is good for thepresent distress, I say, that it is good for a man so to be. Art thou bound unto a wife ? seek not to be loosed. Art thou loosed from a wife ? seek not a wife. . . . But this I say, brethren, the time is short: itremaineth, that both they that have wives be asthough they had none .. . So then he that giveth her (his virgin daughter) in marriage doeth well; buhe that giveth her not in marr iage doeth better " (I Cor. 7:26, 27, 29 and 38)

Before copying any more of Paul's admonitions to the Corinthians, we ask you to consider the question of Paul's expression "present distress" and his statement, "brethren, the time is short!" (1) What wathe "present distress?" (2) What circumstances caused Paul to warn, "brethren, the time is short?" When you learn the answers to those TWO questions,then you will know WHY Paul remained a singleman, and why he urged others to do similarly. "He that is unmarried careth for the things that belongto the Lord, how he may please the Lord: But he that is married careth for the things that are of the world, how he may please his wife" (I Cor. 7:32-33). Paul also wrote: "But I speak this by permission,and not of commandment. For I would that all men were even as myself. But every man hath his proper gift of God, one after this manner, and another after that. I say therefore to the unmarried and widows,It is good for them if they abide even as I. But if they cannot contain, let them marry: for it is better to marry than to burn" (I Cor. 7:6-9).

WHAT WAS THE PRESENT DISTRESS?

What conditions were then present, or would soon come to pa , that would make it more desirable for a person to remain single, rather than married? Christ's warnings to the inhabitants of Jerusalem and Judea and which came to pass in A.D. 70, withthe fall of Jerusalem, urged that women not be 'with child,' and woe to them that 'give suck.' The flight inwild desperation of the Jewish people from their homes was minutely foretold by Christ in Matthew,24th chapter. They were to pray that their flight benot on the Sabbath Day, since such a condition would impede their progress and escape. We can only conclude that for the Corinthians, a persecution of similar nature was in store, and Paul was warning themin the same fashion as Christ had warned the inhabitants of Jerusalem. In fact, the word translated 'distress' — anagke, is used by Christ in Luke 21:23,wherein He states: "... woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck, in those days! for there shall be great distress in the land, andwrath upon this people." Paul the Apostle, uses this word anagke again in I The . 3:7, "... brethren, we were comforted over you in all our affliction anddistress by your faith." Thus, the word appears to carry a special meaning in regard to distress asbrought on by persecution. ,

Paul is thought to have written the First Corinthian letter about 56-57 A.D., and the Meronian persecutions occurred between those dates and the end of Nero's reign, which terminated in 68 A.D. These persecutions were not to be construed as Empire-wide bans against Christianity, but reflected the personal attitude and temperament of Nero toward Christians. For the first five years of Nero's rule,no abuse was tendered the Christians. But duringthe latter portion of his reign, he appeared to take personal delight in subjecting Christians to all manner of tortures. It is known that Nero even broughtthe torture of Christians to the various provinces of his Empire, as he went from city to city, engagingin the grossest immoralities. It is known that Corinth was one of the cities visited by Nero in this series of debaucheries.

Although it is an apocryphal writing, the first epistle of Clement of Rome to the Corinthians, bears out the persecution or persecutions which befell Corinth. The persecution of Christians by Nero occurred within a decade of Paul's First Corinthian Epistle. And, before the end of the first century,A.D., additional persecutions were heaped upon themby Emperor Domitian. Therefore, Paul was doublyaccurate in stressing the fact that "Brethren, thtime is short."

In view of the context of Paul's wr itings, thRoman Church is and has legislated where Paul did not legislate. She is guilty of using the circumstances during a period of distress and emergency, and attempting to apply them for all time to come.

Communication is fundamental and essential to the achievement of a closely related and enduring society

Therefore, it is necessary for Christians to communicate in order to maintain a close relationship.However, in so doing it is also necessar y to keepthe unity of the Spirit in the bonds of peace

It is of significance that Paul prefaced his remarks of admonition to the Ephesians with these words: "With all lowliness and meekness, with longsuffering, forbearing one another in love." — "Endeavouring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond ofpeace" (Ephesians 4:2-3).

We should commend these words of the apostle unto all, because those who possess these Christian attributes will say: Speak Lord and I will hear, command and I will obey

It is difficult to understand any one who teaches that God's word furnishes us with all things that pertain unto life and godline , as taught in II Peter 1:3, who can then substitute a plan after the wisdom of man in an effort to accomplish God's will.

Clear semantics is a vital factor in the process of good communication; and we must be meticulously careful not to be found inconsistent in our position.

The process of establishing trust and communication, as well as unity, between Christians can onlybe accomplished when we are willing to lay aside human wisdom and opinion, using a plan which provides unity of thought and teaching based upon thdivine word of God.

This certainly would be in keeping with the admonition given by the apostle Paul in I Corinthians 1:10; and this is what he said, "Now I beseech yobrethren, by the name (authority) of our Lord Jesus Chr ist, that ye all speak the same thing and thathere be no divisions among you: but that ye beperfectly joined together in the same mind andjudgment."

We can only know God's will as He has revealed it by His word. To follow after the wisdom of men is to deny the all-sufficiency of the word of God as revealed in the New Testament.

The fact cannot be over emphasized that God demands that we be united on the standard that He has furnished us. This will produce unity of thought,and unity of teaching, causing us to rise above personalities, and a desire for power or greatness — all of which constitutes a barrier to obtaining unityThis would also make unnecessar y any effort puforth to obtain unity and fellowship contrary to the revealed will of God.

Today, there are those who appeal to the emotions and prejudice, circumventing truth in an effort tocoerce acceptance of their persuasions, as they use a variety of techniques and media in a campaign tgain others. Thereby, professed followers of theLord have been caught up in the turbulence of a divisive effort, and without knowledge of the truth many acquiesce.

With a lack of honesty, such as this, there can be no amiable communication for bringing the minds together.

Avenues of communication, without which there can be no meeting of the minds, are being destroyedby the attitude of some, who in seeking to defendtheir position on current problems facing the church, assume an air of non-condescending toward those who differ with them. This attitude is contrary tthe Spirit of Christ, and under such conditions, allefforts to resolve differences become devoid of usefulne .

A free and honorable examination of all positions in the light of God's word is a true crucible for dissolving conflicting thought. And in our effort to communicate with others, we should not rashly or arrogantly reprove them, but do so with love, humility and understanding

However, problems confronting the church canonly be enlarged when exponents of pernicious error go unchallenged.

Paul said in Ephesians 6:1, "Brethren, if a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual, restore such an one in the spirit of meekne ; consideringthyself, lest thou also be tempted."

The same apostle also said in Ephesians 4:31, "Let all bitterness, and wrath, and anger, and clamour and evil speaking be put away with all malice."

Therefore, our efforts to communicate Bible truth should be in good will, and certainly not a deliberate attempt at oppression. Thus any discussion of differences should be made in a manner consistent with the highest Christian character. A failure to be thus motivated will grieve the Holy Spirt and bring thewrath of God upon all those who are guilty

When Christians fail to communicate they are hampering understanding and reducing po ibilityof reconciliation.

However, in our efforts to reconcile positions, wemust not lose sight of the fact that failure to carryout the work of God as He has directed does not in any way justify substituting a plan after the wisdom of men, even though it might seem to be more effective.

The doctrine of expediency — "The theory that the end justifies the means," being promulgated bysome, is not in harmony with Bible truth. God does not tolerate infractions of the authority of His word.

Paul said in Ephesians 3:17, "And whatsoever youdo in word or deed, do all in the name (authority) of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God and the Father by Him."

Therefore, any religious practice that does nothave divine authority cannot be of faith, since faithcomes by hearing the word of God (Romans 10:17).And whatsoever is not of faith is sin (Romans 14: 23). Thus to act in our religious practices where God has not spoken is not doing the will of God, but ourown will.

John said, "Whosoever transgresseth, and abidetnot in the doctrine (teaching) of Chr ist, hath noGod. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, hathboth the Father and Son."

For scriptural unity and fellowship to prevail again requires not only an attitude of humility anda love for the souls of those whom we believe to be in error, but also a sincere acceptance and completeconformity to all the revealed will of God, the onlthing that is able to blend the minds together.

Therefore, to keep the unity of the Spirit in thbonds of peace, of nece ity demands hearing andoing the teaching of the Spirt.

Let us heed the admonition of Paul in Romans 15: 5-6: "Now the God of patience and consolation grant you to be like-minded one toward another accordingto Christ Jesus: That ye may with one mind and onemouth glorify God, even the Father of our LordJesus Christ."

A Unique, Astounding, Appalling, and Often Entertaining Analysis of Basic Catholic Belief on Questions of ItsAuthority — on Papal, Sacramental, Biblical (Really Anti-Biblical), and Sacerdotal (Priestly) Authority and Practices

— Analyzed Almost Entirely through a Study of OfficiaCurrent Catholic Literature (Really the Only Way To Handle a Religion Which Gives Itself the Right of EvolutionaryChange in Its Doctrinal Positions) — A Monumental Job of Research — But for All That as Fascinating Reading asYou Are Likely to Come Across— Full of Alternately Naiveand Cynical Self-Contradictions, Breathtaking Absurdities, and Chilling Liberalism and Modernism — A Veritable Encyclopedia of Up-to-date, Authoritative Information Unavailable Elsewhere — A Companion Volume to CATHOLICISM AGAINST ITSELF. Volume I, a Similarly DocumenteGeneral Survey of Catholicism, an Enormously Popular Book, which has gone thr ough eight editions.

Volume I — $4.50 Volume II — $4.50 Both Volumes — $8.00

Order from: PHILLIPS PUBLICATIONS

P. O. Box 17244 Tampa, Florida 33612

'THE POOR SISTERS OF SAINT FRANCIS"

A little incident happened down here in Texas the other day which attracted nation wide attention. AMr. and Mrs. Ernest Medders of Muenster, Texas were high on the social ladder until their bubbleburst. It seems that Mr. Medders had borrowed his way into wealth — a thing pretty difficult to do these days. He put on some of the most lavish parties in the entire state. I understand he went far enoughto secure the private services of Guy Lombardo for a big dance he had in one of his barns. To say the least, this would take a little money

When his creditors began to close in they allwanted to know the same question — where did he get all this money. Well, to their surprise he had borrowed two million dollars from the "Poor sisters of saint Francis" a Roman Catholic organization. Did you notice the name of the organization ? It calls itself POOR but loaned two million dollars. This should open the eyes of many people in America aswell as the church of our Lord. It has been an old trick for years to call an organization by a namwhich conveys poverty to cover up their wealth. To be perfectly honest if someone should tell me about the "poor sisters of Saint Francis" I would immediately think of a bunch of half starved nuns tryingto survive in a dilapidated building. However, to my surprise they are able to loan two million dollars! It shows that men are smart enough to name an organization to cover up wealth. Now, all of this is not among Catholics and sectarians. It has been happening in the church of our Lord for years. These manmade organizations which beg for money out of thLord's treasury are not only unscriptural but also deceptive in their operation. When someone speaksof an "orphan home" or "Childhaven" most of themembers of the church think of a bunch of poolittle half-starved orphans huddled in a corner trying to survive. But alas, is this the real truth? Noindeed, because one of the so-called "orphan homes" in Arkansas loaned a church in Little Rock fortthousand dollars to help construct a building? So the Catholics are not the only ones who say "poor" but in reality are "rich.

Some of the orphan homes among us are so wealthy they will not publish a COMPLETE financial report. It might be rather shocking to most of the brethren if they really knew what some of the so-called "HOMES" are worth. For churches to sup-portfrom their treasuries these human organiza-tions violate at least two Bible principles. First, the church has no scriptural right to make donations to human organizations. The church did its own benevolent work in Acts 6. Second, these so-called homes have been deceptive in leaving the idea ofpoverty when in reality they are wealthy

Oh yes, if someone reading this article can get Complete (notice I said Complete) financial report of all the assets of the homes among us will you pleasesend it to me because I haven't been able to secure one. Then when they tell me that these human organizations are homes just like mine, I will knowwho the infidels (read I Tim. 5:8), are for not supporting their children!

"I have been getting Searching The Scriptures for several years now and I do enjoy it very much." —Birdie Cook, Orlando, Fla

"T hanks so much for your hard work connectedwith the publication of your paper." — Marie Collins, Bradenton, Fla

"I still appreciate your good paper. May the Lordbless your efforts in this work." — Shirley Mullins,Clintwood, Va.

"We look forward to receiving Searching The Scriptures every month. It is very helpful in studying the truth." — Allen D. Harper, Russellville, Ark.

"I am still enjoying the fine articles in SearchingThe Scriptures. Keep up the good work." — J. T. Smith, Dayton, Ohio.

"I received my first i ue of Searching The Scriptures and was both happy and surprised to receive it. I enjoyed reading it and am looking forward to the next i ue." — Mike Willis, Alexandria, Ind.

"You both are still doing a wonderful job iSearching The Scriptures. May God bless you bothwith prolonged health and strength." — Opal L. Smith, Tampa, Fla.

"Brethren, I have been enjoying reading your paper very much." — John E. Breuer, Cuba, Mo.

"You wouldn't believe that I think so, but I dfeel that yours is one of the best, and in many ways the best, paper published by brethren today." — Eugene Britnell, Little Rock, Ark.

"Please remove my name from your mailing list immediately since we are moving to another city.I do not wish to continue or renew the subscription someone anonymously provided. Some of the expository articles have been helpful but there is too much division among Christians now and your paper's preoccupation with fighting error has missed the mark of reaching the lost and strengthening the saved. Alack of love, Pharaseeism and intolerance are as unscriptural as any of the 'issues' you press." — George Edwards, Winston-Salem, N. C.

"We read and enjoy the paper so much." — Mrs. Robert Gaines, Altamonte Springs, Fla.

"I enjoy the paper and appreciate the work you are doing and the firm stand you and brother Miller are making against all the modern innovations into the church. May God help you." — Owen H. Thomas,Waynesville, Ohio.

"I write to commend you on the fine work that you are doing with the paper. We appreciate very muchthe effort you are putting forth in this work and are confident that much and lasting good will be the result of it." — Kenneth R. Camp, Black Rock, Ark.

"The paper is fine." — Luther G. Roberts, Salem,Oregon."I continue to enjoy and benefit from your finepaper." — Grover Hunt, Tuscumbia, Ala

"I continue to appreciate every i ue of the paper ... I pass it on to others who enjoy it also." — Maggie Orton, Lawrenceburg, Tenn.

"We enjoy your paper very much and appreciate the many fine articles." — Philip A. Morr, Romulus,Mich.

"I appreciate your work and effort put on thepaper; I enjoy it very much and feel that you are doing a fine job. Keep up the good work. I am sure that at times it must seem that the job is 'thankle ,'but there are some of us who appreciate your effort,but fail to say so very often." — William C. Sexton,St. Joseph, Mo.

"I have enjoyed each copy very much." — Roy B. Cain, Wauchula, Fla."I enjoy your Searching The Scriptures more than any religious paper I take. Keep up the good work."

— Howard Mathieson, Finksburg, Maryland.

GOOD BOOKS FOR YOUR LIBRARY

Boswell-Hardeman Debate (Instrumental Music) 3.50 Porter-Tingley Debate (Direct operation of the Holy Spirit, Necessity of Baptism and Salva-tion by Faith Only) 3.50 T he Genesis Flood (Henry M. Morris & John C.

Whitcomb) 6.95 The Search For The Ancient Order, Vol. I & II , each 4.00 Alexander Campbell's Tour In Scotland (Chal-mers) 2.00 The Harding-Nichols Debate (Salvation & Bap-tism: The Subject, Action and Design) 2.50 The Campbell-Rice Debate on Baptism 6.00 Larimore And His Boys (Srygley) 3.50 Biography of J. T. Johnson (John Rogers) 3.50 Biography of N. B. Hardeman 3.75 New Commentary On Romans (Grubbs) 2.50 The Witness Of The Spirits (Zachary) 3.00 The Nashville Debate: Moody-Harding (Baptism

and Work of the Holy Spirit) 5.00 History Of Reformatory Movements (Rowe) 5.00 Biblical Criticism ( J . W. McGarvey) 3.50 T he Kingdom Of Promise And Prophecy (R. L .

Whiteside) 2.50 The Christian Baptist (Campbell) Vols. 1 through 7,

each 3.50 Churches of Today (L . G. Tomlinson) 2.50 Fox's Book of Martyrs 3.00 Mormonism Exposed (Hancock) 2.25

Order From-

PHILLIP S PUBLICATIONS P.O. Box 17244 Tampa, Florida 33612

". . . THEY REHEARSED ALL THAT GOD HAD DONE WITH THEM . . ."— Acts 14:27

SPECIAL NOTICE

The church meeting at Plaza Road and Mor-lot Avenue, Fair Lawn, N.J., is considering starting a work in Manhattan, New York, or New Yor k City ar ea.

If you have relatives working in the NewYork City - Long Island area we would like for you to give us their names. Also, if you are in business and travel to New York City occasionally, finding yourself ther e over Sunday, please let us know. We would like this information as quickly as possible.

Write, or call: Church of Christ

Plaza Road & Morlot Ave.

Fair Lawn, N.J. 07410

(201) 796-4497

PAUL K. WILLIAMS RECOMMENDEDFOR SOUTH AFRICA WORK

In view of the plans of Paul K. Williams to beginwork in South Africa soon, we want to give our fellow laborer in the gospel our endorsement, good willand Godspeed.

Br other Williams has wor ked in the Indianapolis area for four years and it has been our pleasure to be associated with him in this locality. Our acquaintance with brother Williams convinces us that he is well equipped in maturity, knowledge and ability for the kind of work he seeks to do in South Africa. His wife and his five boys will be assets to him in thework of saving souls in the difficult field in which hehas chosen to serve.

We are pleased to commend brother Williams to chur ches and individuals who may be in a positionto assist him in his travel fund and salary for the work in South Africa. We commend him to you as a sound, energetic and capable preacher of the gospel who will make a worthy and honest effort for the Cause of Christ on the African continent.

Wm. E . Wallace J. Frank Ingram L. A. Stauffer John H. Gerrard Gene Warman Wm. H. L ewis Har old T abor Cecil Willis Raymond E. Harris

Charles F. House, P. O. Box 641, San Luis, Arizona

— Throughout the entire California and West Coast area (including Los Angeles proper where half a million Spanish speaking people live), Vista California (in the San Diego area) is the only Spanish speaking church standing for the truth. Gabriel Ortiz, P. O. Box 1596, Vista California, faithful preacher there, is still in need of support. Invite him to come visit your congr egation and tell you abouthis work. Bro. Ortiz is willing to go anywhere with the Gospel.

Since my last report, I have visited still other churches here in the far west, and have talked withpreachers, elders, and many brethren, privately withregard to trying to build up interest in preaching the Gospel among the Spanish speaking people during our generation. In Southern California I was privileged to visit with brethren Arthur W. Atkinson of San Bernardino; Harold Houchen and BobBolton, both of Ontario; brethren Joe Neil Claytonof 10th & T ermino in Long Beach; Danny Mahan of Wilmington; Bob McCurdy of Santa Ana and Floyd T hompson of Gar den Gr ove.

We are thankful unto God for the privilege of pr eaching the Gospel in Spanish as well as in theEnglish language. We are thankful that we can tell of the wonderful opportunities to E nglish speaking brethren, for the spreading of the Kingdom amongSpanish speaking people. We earnestly pray thatGod will open the hearts and understanding of more brethren toward these great opportunities to glorify Him. God bless and help us to do His will.

C. O. Tucker, Jacksonville, Fla. — The church of Christ at Marietta is in need of a full time Gospelpreacher. If anyone is interested, please contact C.

O. Tucker, 822 Granville Road, Jacksonville, Florida 32205.

Owen H. Thomas, P.O. Box 362, Waynesville, Ohio

— August 27 will bring to an end my wor k with theThird Street church of Christ in Waynesville. The first Sunday of September I am to begin work withthe Kenmore church in Akron, Ohio. My new address after September 1, 1967 will be: 2275 12th St.,Akr on, Ohio, 44314. All correspondents please take note of my new addr ess. Earl Hartsell, 1615 Shannon Rd., Alexandria, La. — There is now a sound church meeting in Alexandria, La. We are meeting on Sunday afternoon at3 p.m. in the Travelodge Motel in room 104. The Motel is located on MacArthur Drive. My phonenumber is 445-5139.

John A. Thurman, 405 Defender Avenue, Lake City, Fla. — We held our first meeting here in May, 1967. Three were baptized and now with two newadditions in July we have 19 members. One of ourmember s moved away in June. Br other Harold Dowdy of Jacksonville, Florida held the meetingwith brother Gene Dortch assisting him. From June 12-16 sister Irene Sowell Foy held two classes daily in homes for the ladies of the congregation and we were fortunate to have several ladies from the community (a Baptist, and some from the liberal church) to attend.

PREACHING THE WORD — IN MISSOURI AND NEBRASKA

William C. Sexton, St. Joseph, Mo.

"Searching the Scriptures" is the name of a radio program presented by the 10th and Lincoln Sts. congr egation, in St. Joe, Mo. T he station is KUSN — AM/FM, 1270 kc and 105.1 me. The time: Sundaymorning 7:45-8:00. Any one living within 100 miles of St. Joseph should be able to pick us up, and attimes it reaches out for perhaps 150 miles. Shouldyou be in our ar ea, tune us in. If you have relatives in the avea, or friends, tell them to listen.

We established a new attendance r ecor d Sundaymorning July 2, by having 65 present. Previously 56had been our r ecor d. We have a meeting scheduledwith Billy Moore of Butler, Mo., for Sept. 11-17. Coming our way, worship with us — Sunday 10:00and 10:50 p.m., 6:30 p.m.; mid-week, Wednesday,

7:00 p.m.

June 25-27 I preached in a short meeting for thecongregation meeting near 70th Street and No. 2 Highway, in Lincoln, Nebraska. These brethren meet in the basement of brother Keith Rodaway's house. (I recall reading that they did this in Bible times, cf. Rom. 16:5; I Cor. 16:19; Phil. 1:1. Some perhaps would not meet in such; they feel that you must have a fine public building to meet in.) I preached the gospel, and these br ethr en wer e r eceptive; they expressed their appreciation for the truth. We had a good number present, and I believe that we had aprofitable study.

I would encour age any br other going to this city, the capital of Nebraska, to contact these brethren and wor ship with them. T hey ar e located in thesoutheast part of town — contact Darrell K. Rodaway, Route 8, Lincoln, Neb. 68506.

J. T. Smith, Dayton, Ohio — We just concluded ameeting here at the Haynes Street church of Christ with br other Dudley R. Spears of Oklahoma Citydoing the pr eaching. Good lessons wer e br ought every evening, and two confessed wrongs.

The work here at Haynes Street goes well. Wear e to begin a 15 minute r adio pr ogr am on r adio station WING here in Dayton the first of July. Also, we are going to print a monthly publication dealingwith the first principles and denominationalism, that will be sent to ten thousand people in the area close to the Haynes Street meeting house. We are hoping to be able to support another preacher in this area full time in the not too distant future. When you ar e in this ar ea, come wor ship with us.

Our next meeting will be this Fall with James R. Cope doing the speaking.

Jimmy Tuten, Jr., St. Louis, Mo. — Since our last report concerning responses at Spring & Blaine, four have been baptized, eight identified, and three have acknowledged error in their lives and been restored to their first love. Things are looking goodaround Spring & Blaine during the summer months. Preparations are being made for Vacation Bible School in August, and fr om all indications it will beone of our better periods of study.

I recently assisted Harry Pickup, Jr. in a series of meetings at Brushy Chapel, Mo. There is no church in this community and efforts are being made to establish one. The people of the community appear ed most r eceptive to the pr eaching and classes that were conducted. Brother Pickup is to be commended for the preaching that he did under the tent.

When thr ough St. L ouis, wor ship with the Spring & Blaine church.

Norman W. Fisk, Merced, Calif. — This letter is being compiled with the greatest joy and satisfaction. With the providence of God and the help of good brethren in this part of California, the church in Merced, Calif., indeed has much for which to be thankful. Since I moved here about 21 months agothe congregation in Merced has gained 9 members from local liber al congr egations.

We have also just pur chased a ver y nice building in which to wor ship. It will hold about 175 and has 8 class rooms. Being small in number this gives us room to grow. The address is. 61 W. 20th St. Merced, Calif. Ph. 723-2372.

Our attendance is running about 35 with some as high as in the 50's and 60's. T his congr egation started about 21/2 years ago with 4 in attendance thefirst Lord's day. This is truly proof that the pure Gospel will find the honest heart.

If any br ethr en r eading this know of any who ar e living in the Mer ced ar ea that might be willing tolisten to the truth, please write me and let me knowthe names.

Calvin C. Essary, 958 Wilson Ave., Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 — Upon seeing the article on the Causeof Christ in the Salt Lake City-Ogden, Utah area in the Gospel Guardian, Truth Magazine and SearchingThe Scriptures, my wife and I moved here near the end of April, 1967 and I have since been ser ving as the gospel preacher for the church meeting inKaysville.

We deeply appreciate you calling attention to theneed here, for the need is great. I have been able tosecure only $270 per month support. This past weeksaw an end come to another job I had taken in or der to try and have adequate means of paying livingexpenses. I have f ound jobs her e most difficult tofind, and our need for additional support is urged. The gospel must be preached here, and full timeeffort appears almost an absolute necessity in order to accomplish a fraction of the work to be done.

Thus far, since our arrival, one has been baptizedand three restored. We expect any numerical growth to proceed at a "snail's pace," but we are thankful for these results. Brother Bozarth, who is mentionedin the article, is scheduled to hold a meeting for us here this month (July 17th through 23rd). Eastland in Nashville, Tenn., Riverside Drive in Nashville,Tenn., West End in Franklin, Tenn., and Bedford near Goodlettsville, Tenn. are the churches supporting me in the work here at this time. Franklin Road in Nashville, T enn., supplied the major part of ourtraveling expenses to Utah, and University Heights church in Murfreesboro, Tenn. has sent once to our need. Brother Cecil Willis has decided to loan us a mimeograph machine in order that we may publish a teaching bulletin. Our intentions are to stay right here and do so, and we solicit an interest in yourprayers for the work at this place.

I am thankful for the good work being done bySearching The Scriptures, and for the determination of its editors.

J. T. Smith, 310 Haynes Street, Dayton Ohio 45410

— I engaged Mr. Eddie Garrett of the Middletown Primitive Baptist Church in a four night discussion on July 10-11-13-14, 1967. We discussed the following pr opositions:July 10 — "Everyone for whom Christ died will be

unconditionally saved — eternally." Affirm: Eddie Garrett Deny: J. T. Smith

July 11 — "Those alienated from God must obey theconditions set forth in the gospel of Christ before they can be saved." Affirm: J. T.Smith

Deny: Eddie Garrett

July 13 — "A bor n again child of God may so sin as to be finally lost in hell." Affirm: J. T. Smith

Deny: Eddie Garrett

July 14 — "All born again childr en of God will beeternally saved in heaven." Affirm: Eddie Garrett

Deny: J. T . Smith

We are to have a return engagement of this debate in Middletown, Ohio where Mr. Garrett preaches assoon as his people can make arrangements for it.Everyone in that area be sure and attend every night. T he discussion in July was held in the Haynes Street meeting house located at 300 Haynes Street, Dayton, Ohio.

L. L. Applegate, Ver non, Fla. — I know that youall will share in our rejoicing over the conversion of two fine ladies, who responded to the Gospel callyesterday and were baptized into Christ. One hadbeen a Roman Catholic, and the other one had been a Baptist. These conversions came about, primarily as the result of private teaching in their homes. We are expecting others to respond at any time now — inasmuch as we have been wor king with some f or as long as two or three months now, for at least one teaching session a week.

The church here in Vernon is greatly encouraged over these responses which is the "fruit" of manyhours of labor.

AN EXPOSITORY DICTIONARY OF NEW TESTAMENT WORDS

W. E. Vine

This book is a valuable work to the Bible student. It is a standard work based upon a firm textual and grammatical foundation with renderings of the words and phrases of the New Testament from both Authorized and American Revised Versions, and against the background of the original Greek. It is a dictionary, a concordance, and a commentary in one volume. Price— $11.95

The historian, Eusebius, lived in the last of the third and the early part of the fourth century. When the Nicaean Council met in 325 A.D., Eusebius is said to have had an active part in its proceedings. In his history, Eusebius quotes from the writings of Dionysius, concerning those who were followers of Nepos. I first give the quotation, after which a few points shall be noticed."But they produce a certain work of Nepos, uponwhich they lay great stress, as if he advanced thingsthat are irrefragable, when he asserts that there will be an earthly reign of Christ. In many other respects I accord with and greatly love Nepos, both on account of his faith and industry and his great study in theScriptures; as also for his great attention to psalmody, by which many are still delighted. I greatly reverence the man also, for the manner in which he haddeparted this life. But the truth is to be loved andhonoured before all. It is just, indeed, that we should applaud and approve whatever is said aright, but itis also a duty to examine and correct whatever may not appear to be written with sufficient soundness .." Of a later discussion, Dionysius wr ote: "Nor did we attempt to evade objections, but endeavored as far as possible to keep to our subject, and to confirm these (earlier convictions, O.H.). Nor ashamed if reason prevailed, to change opinions, and to acknowledge the truth; but rather received with a good conscience and sincerity, and with single hearts, before God, whatever with established by the proofs anddoctrines of the holy Scriptures. At length Coracio, who was the founder and leader of this doctrine, inthe hearing of all the brethren present, confessed and avowed to us, that he would no longer adher e to it, nor discuss it, that he would neither mention norteach it, as he had been fully convinced by the opposite arguments. The other brethren present rejoiced also at this conference, and at the conciliatory spirit and unanimity exhibited by all."

The above quotations are very revealing, revealing

of human conduct in search of truth, revealing of

attitudes of disputants in a discussion, and r evealing

of what an honest investigation can do. Let us take

a closer look at some of the interesting points of

these quotations.

1. The "earthly reign of Christ" has been troubling the chur ch longer than many may think.It should be noted that when it did appear, itwas not treated as an innocent opinion. It wastreated as deadly error, something that should be exposed. T his is exactly the way all error should be treated. When Paul set forth the purity of the church in Eph. 5:25-27, he left noroom for error, and he who permits it has betrayed a sacred trust. As Dionysius put it, "It is also a duty to examine and correct whatever may not appear to be written with sufficient soundness."

1. Dionysius apparently loved and respected Nepos very much. In addition to his ability in theScriptures, Nepos had other talents — he delighted many with his psalmody. He was a talented man, one whose ability could have beenworth much to the church. His popularity or influence did not change the fact that "truth is to be loved and honoured before all." He would applaud all that Nepos said that was right, and, with the same vigor, he would oppose the error which Nepos taught.
2. He sought out the followers of this error and engaged them in discussion. He demonstrated alove for their soul and for truth. He felt this to be his solemn duty.
3. In their discussions all endeavored to keep toto the subject and did not evade objections(arguments). It appears that all were more concerned with truth than with self -glorification. They apparently did not believed in one-sided discussions, but wanted all to be heard. The honest just would not backbite, falsely accuse,or hide their convictions. They would face the opposition and wer e willing for what they believed to be put to the acid test of public discussion. Dionysius said they were all willing toaccept "whatever was established by the proofs and doctrines of the holy Scriptures." Opinions, what Father thought, what brother said, or that which was popular were all forsaken for the truth. It takes a lot of courage and a great' deal of faith in God's Wor d to do this. Many do not have either today! Their chief way of discussing is when the opponent is not present. T hey accuse and abuse a per son's name, butthey dare not face him under fair circumstances. T he ones discussed in our quotationwere not ashamed to say, "I am wrong." Whenfound to be-wrong, they confessed it before all. They had not merely made a mistake in judgment, they had sinned and acknowledged thesame. T he man who did this, in this case, was a preacher! There was no effort to white-wash the man in his error or to excuse him on any gr ounds whatsoever. And, in the end, honor prevailed.
4. There was joy over those who had forsaken error, a soul had been saved, and the truth did triumph. T his will always be the case when honest investigations are had, and when there is a willingness to accept the truth. When men ar e willing to accept truth, willing to accept whatthe Scriptures teach, error will be defeated. But, as long as honor is laughed at, so long as men ignore the Scriptures, so long as pride shall govern the heart, just that long the church shall be plagued with err or and with the men thatteach it.

I do not know so very much about other areas, but the thoughts suggested her e have a highly desir able application in the state of California. Rarely do youfind the "liberals" willing to practice the honor herein suggested. They do a great deal of talk in yourabsence and resort to the foulest kind of criticism in an apparent effort to prejudice the minds of those who might be inclined to listen. However, the "liber als" ar e not especially in mind as I comment onthese quotations. There is, I believe, a more sinister force undermining the purity of the church — per haps I should have said forces. I should like to suggest some of those dangers for your consideration.

Consider the idea that about all it takes for a church to be called sound is for it to oppose the "Herald of Truth" and church supported orphan homes. It may be filled with rebellious members from other congr egations, but it is still sound because itopposes the above mentioned errors. This is definitely an attitude which is prevailing in some quarters.

Again, when a preacher teaches error or sins in some other way, he has mer ely made a mistake injudgment or there is just a difference of opinion.T his, I have per sonally hea,r d used sever al times in an effort to excuse a preacher from wrong doing.Should such a pr eacher happen to be in the "clique" of preachers,he is pushed ahead, patted on the back,def ended by some fake ar gument, or other wise condoned in his wr ong. Some pr eacher s have actuallybeen known to urge younger preachers to contactother pr eacher s to find out how to pr each in certain places. Regar dless of how small the tendency, this is a dangerous trend. When the actions of elders (and I do mean elder s) ar e disr egar ded, and when thejudgment of some pr eacher has taken the place of the judgment of elders or the congregation; brethren, something is badly wr ong.

Another attitude that is playing its part in destroying the pur ity of the chur ch is the attitude of "time." Let someone do wrong, and all he has to do is wait a year or so (without r epenting) and he is received back. People are heard to say, "Yes, but that was a long time ago, Brother Holderby," as if time wiped away the sin. They fail, apparently, to realize that only r epentance can permit God to wipe awaythe guilt of sin.

Other things could be said, but these are enoughfor the moment. And, these things are not figments of anyone's mind. Almost everywhere I go I hearpeople talking of these ver y attitudes and acts. T hose who are interested in the purity of New Testament Christianity should be aware of these trends. Weshould go further; we should vow that these shallnot go unnoticed or unchallenged. We need unity inthe L or d's chur ch, unity based solidly upon God's Word. It is my fervent prayer that while we so strongly fight "liberalism" that we shall not forget to "police" our own r anks.

OLD RELIGIOUS PAPERS FOR SALE Jerry Eubanks, 4056 Cedar Knoll Dr., Tucker, Ga. 30084—Due to the death of my father-in-law, Walter N. Henderson, I now have extra sets of religious periodicals that I would like to sell for sister Henderson. Gospel Guardian, Vol. 7 (1955) through Vol. 18(1966), complete except for 19 issues. $30 plus postage. Preceptors, Vol. 3 (1953) through Vol. 15 (1966), complete except for 18 issues. $15 plus postage. Searching The Scriptures, Vols. 2, 4, 5, 6, 7. $10 plus postage.

THE CHURCH

The word "church" in our English Bible is translated fr om the Gr eek wor d "ekklesia" which means "the called out." That this is a very appropriate term for God's people is illustrated from many passages. A few: I Thes. 2:12, II Thes. 2:14, II Tim. 1:9, II Pet. 5:10.

The term "church" is used in only two senses inthe New T estament. One is the "local" sense. T his usage is found in such passages as Acts 13:1, 14:23, 5:11, 8:1, 15:22, I Cor. 1:2, Rom 16:16.In this sense it represents all "the called out" in a given localitywho have formed themselves into a single working unit. The other is the "universal" sense. This usage is found in such passages as Matt. 16:18,1 T im. 3:15, Eph. 1:22-23, Acts 2:41 and 47. In this sense it represents all "the called out" of all the world.

Now, notice: The "universal church" is not composed of all the "local churches," but of all the saved

— called out — of all the world! Each member bears a direct relationship to the church universally just as he does the church locally! His membership inthe chur ch univer sally does not come thr ough his being a member of the church locally. Under certain conditions one in fact may be a member of the church universal and not a member of any local congregation! (Acts 2:41 and 47, 8:36-38, 9:26).

The only earthly organization which the Lord hasgiven to activate the chur ch, or through which thechurch might function as a unit, is that of the local congregation with its aiders, deacons, and members (Acts 14:23, 20:17-28, Phil. 1:1, Tit. 1:5-7, I Pet.5:1-5).

The Lord did not give the "church universal" anyearthly or ganization thr ough which to function. Therefore, any attempt to activate the "church universal" through an earthly organization is contrary to the scriptures. Any tying together of two or more congr egations into a single wor king unit — givingtheir individual work (or work to which they are equally related) and funds for said work to the oversight of said unit — requires an organization for which there is no Biblical authority! It makes no difference whether that organization be a society,association, corporation, or an eldership which has overstepped its scriptural limitations (I Pet. 5:1-5),it has no Biblical authorization! This is one of the reasons why such things as brotherhood orphanages, old folks' homes, hospitals, colleges, etc., supported from church treasuries; sponsoring churches, Herald of Tr uth, and missionar y societies ar e wr ong.

The Lord has given no organization for a working unit smaller than the local congregation through which the church might function. Therefore, in acongr egation, when a Ladies' Aid Society, SundaySchool, Bible Class, or Young Peoples' Group functions on their own, collecting, and disbursing theirown funds, thus operating as a separate entity, theydo so without Bible authority!

THE PEOPLE'S NEW TESTAMENT WITH EXPLANATORY NOTES

B. W. Johnson

This new one-volume edition is the product of many years of dedicated study, research and in-sight. It contains the entire New Testament in both the King James and Revised Versions, inparallel columns for ready reference and comparison. A verse -by - verse study on the same page with the text.A very popular commentary.

Single volume of entire

N.T $5.00